thecompasspoint | The Compass Point

Author Archives: thecompasspoint

School of the past, school of the future

This summer I the quite wonderful Hancock Shaker Village. It’s where in craft and design, form meets function with simplicity and beauty. So many interesting things to see and pay attention to.

Of course – I had to visit the schoolhouse, now separated from the main buildings by a busy highway.

The school room was bright and well lit and seemed both familiar and welcoming. The shelves held books, quills and slates. There was a stove with a long pipe, and a teacher’s desk at the front and on it a handbell. Student desks were in rows and tall windows framed pleasant vistas in spite of the road.

The date on the blackboard was 1898.

At around the same, a French postcard presented a view of the school of the future – the year 2000. The same room, students still in those desks and rows. But now knowledge has been mechanized. Knowledge as represented by books is fed into a hand cranked mincing machine (at least there’s one active learner!) and directed to the heads of passive students via electrical circuits dropped from the ceiling.

It all looks like the nightmare of an isolation chamber/ computerized/ learning laboratory devoted to mind control.

21st century schools, Books, Change, Education, Educational Insanity, Future, Humor, Learning

0 Comments

Future past imperfect

Enjoy the drawing. But but then read this: Shifting Ground from Chris Lehmann.

From the Chicago Tribune 1958. (But only one child distracted by the flying machine outside the classroom?)

21st century schools, Change, Education, Future, Humor, Technology

1 Comment

What's changed?

What’s changed? Pretty much everything.

A question to get going with:
Shopping and information then and now: If you want the best dishwasher or digital camera or know how to remove turmeric stains from linen or why there’s a sudden infestation of ladybugs – where would you go to figure it out?

And for most people the answer would be: online.

What did not change in that equation was the desire for the product and information. And wanting to be informed.

But let’s not confuse the map with the territory and destination.

In school technology changes everything. And nothing. Children are the same. But they experience the world differently than a generation ago. Fortunately we have some amazing and empowering tools to help us to fulfill our mission to develop educated citizens with a passion for learning and living. And the tools are all around us, and them. The question is – are the tools in use? Or in digital detention?

It’s not about the tools – just as it never was – but the learning, the meaning, and the purpose. And it’s not just about doing things more efficiently or faster – it’s about agency and access, empowerment and transformation.

And for a reminder of just how much has changed in the way we conduct our, here is a quick slide show memory jolt from Dangerously Irrelevant on the pace and breadth of technological impact on (almost) every aspect of life, work, and leisure

Digital Technology Impact Slides[gigya width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=castledigitaltechnologyimpactslides-091202063525-phpapp01&stripped_title=digital-technology-impact-slides" quality="high" wmode="tranparent" ]

View more presentations from mcleod.

21st century schools, Change, Creativity, Education, Future, Learning, Mission Vision Values, Progressive Education, Technology

0 Comments

Whatever it takes….

Oldie but goodie. An irresistible cartoon from the Syracuse-Herald Journal 1991
From another era…or…?

21st century schools, Assessment, Education, Educational Insanity, Humor, Learning, Motivation, Progressive Education

0 Comments

Locking the gate: Data is Dead, Long Live Data

When I’m in the car I listen to WAMC, and yesterday I heard Roland Fryer’s Dowmel lecture. His specialty is race-based economic issues, and his research projects seek to answer the question of why African-Americans are harder hit by poverty than other demographic groups in America

The focus was education and the data dismal.

Fryer is a brilliant economist, an engaging speaker and he told a compelling personal story – from the streets to Harvard via football, an aptitude for mathematics and the support of his grandmother, a teacher

He says we have to do “Whatever it takes” and “Whatever works” when it comes to lifting achievement of poor performing groups. For Fryer this includes financial incentives and he is one of the voices behind NYC’s scheme to pay students for performance in school.

Data is big in the education world right now. Nothing wrong with that. But what is it data about? There’s the rub.
Data is good. Good data is even.

One of the key tenets of a progressive approach to education is the attention to the whole child. Education is not about academics only and intellectual growth is not limited to verbal proficiency and mathematical achievement alone. (Beyond that of course – the evidence clearly shows that the arts, physical activity and creative play all boost test scores.) The focus on testing narrows the path and locks the gate for so many children

Fryer spoke of the gold standard of data versus the heart standard of the anecdotal “I know it’s working because I feel it in my heart.” I am all for the gold standard. But – for me that means looking at what we are measuring. Some things are still bigger than the constituent parts and the punishments and rewards built into the current school testing system ignores the realities of what matters most. Test scores often reflect children’s backgrounds more than the quality of a given teacher or school.

The data shows that poor children fail in school and drop out in large numbers. It does not show that they lacked a desire to learn and succeed when they entered. Maybe the issue is not the lack of motivation but something else: The support, encouragement, resources and achievement that accompany active and joyful learning perhaps.

So here’s a thought: If the data shows that students aren’t learning effectively, could it be because of the prevalence and persistence of traditional beliefs and practices in our schools?

And a second thought: Let’s work on finding ways to test what actually matters most.

21st century schools, Assessment, Change, Creativity, Critical thinking, Data, Education, Learning, Many minds, Progressive Education, Uncategorized

0 Comments

State of play

So the debate on the purpose of play in early childhood simmers on. It popped up on my Facebook page yesterday with this from the ASCD: Play is problem solving

That then led me to the The Playtime’s the Thing from the Washington Post.

The pressure is on to raise achievement scores and this puts the squeeze on time for play.

“If we are to prevent the achievement gap and develop a cradle-to-career educational pipeline, early learning programs are going to have to be better integrated with the K-12 system,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Wednesday at a convention of the nation’s largest early childhood organization, the National Association for the Education of Young Children.

With school districts targeting student achievement the focus has been on literacy – especially reading and math skills for children at ever-younger ages. No Child Left Behind requires schools to ensure that all children are proficient in math, reading and writing by 2014. What could be wrong with that? Well – quite a lot as it happens. With a society that actually needs a wide range of aptitudes and abilities – with the route to actual success in school being more than the narrow gateway of test scores – we are in danger of leaving many children behind.

Furthermore – it appears that while certain measures of proficiency show up in test results the far reaching effects of lack of play do not. According to the article lost playtime shows up in life. And with devastating, costly consequences – delinquency, school failure, emotional disturbance and delayed social development.

It’s with dismay, then, that I read the statistic of the amount of play allowed quote story:

“… in kindergarten, children are playing for fewer than 30 minutes a day, according to a study of full-day kindergartens in New York City and Los Angeles published in the spring by the Alliance for Childhood, a nonprofit group based in College Park. They spend four to six times more time on literacy, math and test-taking than they do on play.

What it signals to me is a false dichotomy of play and work. Perhaps adults can distinguish between the two – although meaningful work often has a playful aspect. But for small children the two are one and the same.

If play is the work of the child then why are we keeping these children from their essential work for a short-term bump in test scores? And at what price? Evidence seems to suggest that this educational dead end short circuits the very activity – the industry and intellectual activity of active play – that children need to grow academically and socially.

I’m with Friedrich Froebel on this one:

Play is the highest level of child development…It gives…joy, freedom, contentment, inner and outer rest, peace with the world…The plays of childhood are the germinal leaves of all later life.

21st century schools, Assessment, Creativity, Curriculum, Data, Education, Educational Insanity, Kindergarten, Learning, Literacies, Lower School, Many minds, Mission Vision Values, Progressive Education, Research

0 Comments

Publish! And democratize learning

Interesting post from The Innovative Educator: 21st Century Educators Don’t Say, “Hand It In.” They say, “Publish It!

Read the post to hear what happened when she put out the word via Twitter and also to see her suggestions for making it happen in the classroom.

Meanwhile – here is one of the slides from a presentation by C.K. Prahalad* at the recent TEDIndia in Mysore. It’s about democratizing learning. Are these the key points? What do you think?

*C.K. Prahalad studies business and innovation around the globe — from the top to the bottom of the economic pyramid. He asks, “How do you convert information into insight, and then into action?” Learning, he says, is about inference; two people will infer different things from the same information. We can improve learning by understanding the processes that alter the way different people make inferences. …. We’re at a unique point in history — more people than ever have access to information through technology, but we must democratize learning, too. Books
http://blog.ted.com/tedindia

21st century schools, Change, Choice, Education, Future, Learning, One World, Technology

1 Comment

Dangerous praise

Good reminder about how not to praise from Stephen Currie in a recent post to the PDS Math Guy Blog.

It’s all to do with the effort effect and how to talk to kids about their work. Researcher Carol Dweck’s work has shown that praise for being smart is a great demotivator. Here are the researcher’s tips for a better way to talk to kids about their work:

Here are Dweck’s tips from Mindset:

Listen to what you say to your kids, with an ear toward the messages you’re sending about mind-set.
Instead of praising children’s intelligence or talent, focus on the processes they used.
Example: “That homework was so long and involved. I really admire the way you concentrated and finished it.”Example: “That picture has so many beautiful colors. Tell me about them.”
Example: “You put so much thought into that essay. It really makes me think about Shakespeare in a new way.”
When your child messes up, give constructive criticism—feedback that helps the child understand how to fix the problem, rather than labeling or excusing the child.
Pay attention to the goals you set for your children; having innate talent is not a goal, but expanding skills and knowledge is. Don’t worry about praising your children for their inherent goodness, though. It’s important for children to learn they’re basically good and that their parents love them unconditionally, Dweck says. “The problem arises when parents praise children in a way that makes them feel that they’re good and love-worthy only when they behave in particular ways that please the parents.”

Education, Intelligence, Motivation, PDS People, Progressive Education, Research

1 Comment

"We wish all children could be glad and safe"

“War is not here”
“No sirens are warning us of air raids”
and the last line
“We wish all children could be glad and safe.”

In all-school activity groups on Tuesday students wrote what they are thankful for on strips of colored paper – now displayed in the lobby. (Family, friends and pets feature strongly.)

As reported by the Poughkeepsie New Yorker evening edition for November 21 1941 they did the same thing 68 years ago. It was before Pearl Harbor but the world was at war and the children knew it.

They were thankful for being safe, for the army, the navy, and for for living in a democracy where they could “cooperate to defend their country’. They were thankful for the freedom to worship God and criticize the president without being put in a concentration camp.

On the same page as the PDS story are two accounts of a torpedo boat fight. The German high command version is quite different from the British Admiralty story.

For pictures of our activities on Tuesday – check the Flickr feed – below right. In addition to making the list we also had pumpkin squares baked by the fifth and sixth grades and sang the now traditional “Thank-you” song written by students for the original musical “Life on Earth” in 1999. The story was the quite wonderful Giving Thanks by Jonathan London beautifully illustrated by Gregory Manchess. Thank you Robbie Puglisi and the kindergarten class for bringing it to my attention.

Books, Change, Education, PDS Events, PDS People, Progressive Education

3 Comments

Testing Madness on the Race to Nowhere

A colleague at a nearby school sent me this link to the NYTimes – just the latest bulletin from a world gone mad with narrow definitions of achievement and success. Test prep for pre-school no less. And a real moneymaker for the lucrative (and unregulated) test prep industry.

Tips for the Admissions test – to Kindergarten

“Kayla Rosenblum sat upright and poised as she breezed through the shapes and numbers, a leopard-patterned finger puppet resting next to her for moral support.

But then came something she had never seen before: a visual analogy showing a picture of a whole cake next to a slice of cake. What picture went with a loaf of bread in the same way?

Kayla, who will be 4 in December, held her tiny pointer finger still as she inspected the four choices. “Too hard,” she peeped.

Test preparation has long been a big business catering to students taking SATs and admissions exams for law, medical and other graduate schools. But the new clientele is quite a bit younger: 3- and 4-year-olds whose parents hope that a little assistance — costing upward of $1,000 for several sessions — will help them win coveted spots in the city’s gifted and talented public kindergarten classes.”

What happened to childhood?

What happened to all the decades of research and study that shows that play is the work of the child and that narrow definitions of achievement serve only to exclude children from their birthright of unique success?

What happened to common sense that knows that getting down on the floor and playing with, and listening to, children is best way to help their cognitive growth? There are ways to promote children’s intellectual growth. Test prep anxiety is not one of them.

This week we both heard Dr. Paul Yellin whose presentation to parents and faculty began by emphasizing what we already know about children’s minds:

There is no perfect brain
Intellectual diversity is the norm
Brains change over time and continue to grow throughout our lifetimes

One size does not fit all. PDS knows that. We all know that. All kinds of minds deserve respect and appreciation and can learn. Resilient, creative, flexible, ethical and persistent thinkers and doers succeed. And learning is a habit for a lifetime and directly connected with personal purpose and joy. The best preparation is to build school learning that enables children to develop those skills and the test is life itself. And it begins with play. It does not begin with pumping your child with canned instruction. Programs like Baby Einstein are cognitive dead ends. (You can now apply for a refund from Disney – this is true, check the link.)

We all know that the world needs a variety of aptitudes and experiences and we must value each child’s unique talents and know they are on an individual journey. There are many minds within one family – let alone classroom, school, world. And we need all of them.

Why then do we continue to insist otherwise with our emphasis on testing and the pressure and anxiety that goes with it.

I need a new category for some posts to this blog: Educational Insanity.

And what is the price of this testing madness? Childhood is the price. And you only get one of those. And if we strip the joy of learning from childhood then the damage is incalculable. And to what end?

At the high school level here’s one answer in Race To Nowhere. This film takes a look at education, childhood and the unintended consequences of the achievement and test obsessed way of life that permeates American education and culture. The pressure on kids is unrelenting and is creating a generation suffering from unprecedented levels of stress, depression and burnout. No wonder 2,000 kids a day drop out of high school. Here’s the trailer:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--zDyLGQYGk&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0]

And in the Hope department: Here comes this from Time Magazine.

“The insanity crept up on us slowly; we just wanted what was best for our kids….”

Read more: The growing backlash against overparenting.

Assessment, Creativity, Critical thinking, Diversity, Education, Educational Insanity, Future, Intelligence, Kindergarten, Learning, Lower School, Many minds, PDS Events, Progressive Education

3 Comments

How to effect change

Education is all about change. And fun makes it so much more effective. Here’s a great example from Stockholm – sent to me by a parent.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lXh2n0aPyw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6]

Change, Education, Future, Motivation, Play, Technology

0 Comments

That was then: Are we "betraying most of our children"?

From: We are the people movie people

This landmark independent documentary … explores the education system … and asks whether the current system provides young people with the opportunity to develop their talents. High-profile figures sharing their personal experiences and views include Sir Richard Branson, Germaine Greer, Henry Winkler, Bill Bryson, Sir Ken Robinson and a wide range of education experts from around the world.

This thought-provoking film offers unique insight across generations and nations, and reveals a very inconvenient truth about education. The world is changing rapidly – but our education system is not keeping pace.

And just look at all that great footage of industrial Britain and the classrooms I remember!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRi8_fXz1D8&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6]

21st century schools, Change, Creativity, Critical thinking, Curriculum, Education, Film, Future, Going Green, High School, Learning, Mission Vision Values, Nature, Professional Development, Technology, Uncategorized

1 Comment

The new literacy ladder. What rung are you on?

The world is moving at a tremendous rate. Going no one knows where. We must prepare our children, not for the world of the past. Not for our world. But for their world. The world of the future. – John Dewey

PDS graduates students who…

possess a rich academic knowledge base and know how to think as creative, flexible, independent, resourceful learners for life
are intellectually curious, active seekers, users and creators of knowledge – from our mission

Fullscreen capture 11142009 15021 PM Take a look at this The Social Technographics ladder. It’s from Groundswell: winning in a world transformed by social technologies written by Charlene Li and Josh Bernofff .

At the top of the ladder are the Creators. At the bottom rung are the Inactives who do not engage at any level either by choice or lack of opportunity. Seems to me that we want all our students to climb on that ladder and ascend to the top rung of this groundswell that the authors define as:

A social trend in which people use technologies to get the things they need from each other, rather than from traditional institutions like corporations.

Think of the world of the web and interactive technology as a new ecosystem – one in which any person, in any place, at any time can participate, contribute, communicate, produce, and share. It’s an ecosystem that has the potential to make prosumers of us all. That is producers and not just consumers of information and media content.

That top rung is small in the wider world (you can see the stats by rung and country at the link) but in schools with students beyond the early elementary years it should be 100%. In school – at PDS at least – getting engaged, being creative and collaborating is not an optional activity. And technological innovation makes it possible to engage with a global reach. And if we believe in the importance of innovation and creativity, making a positive contribution and changing the world – there is the purpose. It brings a whole new meaning to the eduspeak catch phrases of problem-solving and ethical and creative thinking. It makes our mission possible in effective, dynamic and inclusive ways.

Good schools have always developed prosumers: Students read novels, poetry and essays; solved puzzles and problems; consumed charts and graphs, and watched videos and film. But they also wrote, posed and created them. Now they can produce them, share them and test their quality with a wider audience. (Authentic assessment.) It’s one big intellectual sandbox and showcase where everything can be interactive and collaborative. The lines between producer and consumer have blurred. So have the lines between learner and teacher. Both can learn and both can teach. That has always been possible. Now it is closer to essential. Given the pace of change students and learners are in the sandbox together. (Teacher as coach, guide at the side not sage on the stage.)

Once we grasp the concept of the groundswell and see its potential for learning the more we will enter this new ecosystem and learn and teach the skills of navigation. It a whole new set of literacy skills to be understood and brought into the classroom. And by incorporating these tools and this potential we are preparing students to function constructively in the world where this groundswell is becoming a tide.

What does the ladder look like?

Top Rung: Creators
This is the group who regularly – at least once a month – publish a blog, put an article online, maintain a website, contribute to a wiki, or upload music or videos. They engage, create and contribute online. In the United States it’s about 25% of people. We have top rung students. They all should be top rung. Our job is to move them up the ladder with what we teach, how we teach and what we expect. We need to systematically seek the next level with what we require of students.

Second Rung: Critics
These are the reactors who comment on and critique the work of others. In writing classes it’s a common best practice for students to comment on and respond to the work of classmates. This takes that good practice to a wider world. Our students are growing up in a world where this kind of interactivity is usual practice. How do we prepare them for it in the academic arena and beyond the world of social networking? Everyone’s a critic these days and the online ecosphere is full of commentary. How are we helping students engage in this world by commenting on and contributing to the work of others??

Third Rung: Collectors
These are people who collect bookmarks, RSS feeds, vote for sites on Reddit and Digg, who StumbleUpon, use Diigo or Delicious and amass all manner of digital media from their travels online.

So, what are the best ways to do that effectively? How do we teach how to find, evaluate, filter and store our collected material, bookmarks, feeds and links. Where do we teach that literacy?

Fourth Rung: Joiners
These are the people who have profiles on social networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn etc. It was students who gave these sites their initial boost but they are becoming ubiquitous among all age groups of computer users. Teachers are apparently among the most rapidly increasing user group together with the middle aged and elderly. But what are the skills students need to maintain effective sites and use them to promote themselves in a professional or scholarly way? How do they protect their on-line identity and leave the digital trail that accurately represents them?

Fifth Rung: Spectators
Consumers. This is the largest segment because it includes everyone in all the rungs above. And given just how much is available participation in this rung is all about the choices we make online. Where do we go for what and how and why? To “develop educated citizens” we need selective spectatorship.

The bottom rung: Inactives
Out of the loop and off the grid. These are the people who have no access to the technology or the web or who choose not to participate. This is not an option at PDS. Although it does provide an opportunity to help others start climbing the ladder.

Do we have a choice?

Getting on the ladder and starting the climb is a literacy and survival issue for the 21st century.

Non participation is not optional for educators who want to educate children for their futures I began with quotations from John Dewey and our mission. I did that because I believe that this work is consonant with a progressive approach to education. I believe that the tools of the online world bring exciting new possibilities for finally making the ideals of progressive education a reality. The question for me is not why? But how? In what ways? With whom? And to which mission-consistent ends? Teaching these skills and engaging in the ecosystem is an outgrowth of our mission and is what our students need and deserve.

How do we get started?

We already have. Take a look at what is required of students at every level and every subject and you will see students using technology (remember – a crayon is technology) to engage in the information and social ecosystem. It may look different at various grade levels and subject areas but students are already on the ladder in school and at home. And there are so many examples throughout the school. And it starts with what good teaching at PDS has always looked like – active, engaged students and teachers learning by doing.

“Each step on the ladder represents a group of consumers more involved in the groundswell than the previous steps. To join the group on a step, a consumer need only participate in one of the listed activities at least monthly.”

Each rung of the ladder represents a literacy challenge for us and our students. We need to climb the ladder and we need to help our students climb the ladder. And what an opportunity for community learning! I used to teach English. We have middle school students at PDS who have published more short stories than I have in all my years of teaching writing (none).

Our job is to help students build the skills they will need to understand and thrive in the ecosystem in which they must swim.

Here are the presentation slides of the ladder:

Social Technographics Explained

21st century schools, Assessment, Change, Choice, Curriculum, Future, Learning, Literacies, Professional Development, Progressive Education, Technology

2 Comments

With the guns

Buttercup Farm November 2009

With school closed for the day there was time for a walk.

Buttercup Farm Sanctuary off Route 82 just north of Stanfordville has one path that tracks along Wappingers Creek as it runs down from the head waters at Thompson Pond south toward the Hudson.

It was quiet except for the rustle of squirrels, a few birds – juncos, jays and titmice mostly – and the occasional commotion of mallard startled up from the rushes. Beavers had been at work with trees gnawn down to sharpened pencil stubs and their work had blocked a waterway and flooded the walks.

And then the sound of single gunshots from across the water toward Stissing Mountain. Hunters perhaps. Or a target range. But because of the incident yesterday I thought of nearby Pine Plains. And because it is Veterans Day, Armistice Day, my mind went to “With the guns” – D.H.Lawrence’s August 1914 essay from the Manchester Guardian written just as the first world war was beginning. Watching reservists giddy with excitement and anticipation clamber aboard a train he has no such illusions about guns and war:

Last autumn I followed the Bavarian army down the Isar valley and near the foot of the Alps. Then I could see what war would be like – an affair entirely of machines, with men attached to the machines as the subordinate part thereof, as the butt is the part of a rifle.

Many greeted the war with jubilation. The streets of the great cities of Europe were thronged with crowds thrilled by the sense of adventure and the opportunity to take part. But not Lawrence. He recalled what he saw and felt at that rehearsal for the war to come:

Then out of a little wood at the foot of the hill came the intolerable crackling and bursting of rifles. The men in the trenches returned fire. Nothing could be seen. I thought of the bullets that would find their marks. But whose bullets? And what mark. Why must I fire off my gun in the darkness towards a noise? Why must a bullet come out of the darkness, breaking a hole in me? But better a bullet than the laceration of a shell, if it came to dying. But what is it all about? I cannot understand; I am not to understand. My God, why am I a man at all, when this is all, this machinery piercing and tearing?

It is a war of artillery, a war of machines, and men no more than the subjective material of the machine. It is so unnatural as to be unthinkable.

Yet we must think of it.

It was unthinkable then. It is unthinkable now. But we must think of it.

Passchendaele, November 1917

Nature, The Hudson Valley

1 Comment

"I deserve it, you don't": Marshmallows and crime

Deferred gratification – that ability to work for something now at the expense of immediate reward in order to receive a greater reward later – has long been a social staple of the middle class. Work hard in school,earn a place in college and get a better paying job. Save for a deposit and buy a house. It is a system that plays out in innumerable ways involving early sacrifice in order to realize later gains.

Perhaps the recent economic meltdown put a dent in the system – high credit card debt and the housing bubble where too many were encouraged to take on mortgages they could not sustain. Some say that an ethos of “live now-pay later” has replaced the “work hard-wait for your just desserts”.

But deferred gratification is still very much in place in the thinking about education. And that is as it should be. Students do need to work hard in school and as importantly establish the habits of sustained effort, impulse control and persistence. And when they are supported in doing so the rewards can be enormous. But sometimes there is another and less attractive side effect. It involves the sense of entitlement. Students who begin with every advantage of background and support and who then must endure a school atmosphere of such stress and competitive pressure that they develop a sense of privileged entitlement. “I worked so hard I deserve the (name your reward) – a place at a highly competitive college, a well paying job, position, privilege. They are oblivious to the efforts of others and feel entitled to the success they have been enabled to achieve. It’s an unattractive “I deserve it, you don’t” mentality. The hard work they refer to is often the absurd levels of pressure in their ridiculously over stuffed high school years where stress is relieved in self destructive ways and the sense of entitlement is instilled with a heavy hand.

But what about the marshmallows?

In the 1960’s psychologist Walter Mischel developed The Marshmallow Test. He would give a children a single marshmallow, then leave them alone in the room after making this offer: eat it right now – or – if they waited for him to return, get two marshmallows. A recent New Yorker article Don’t! The Secret of Self Control put it this way put it:

Footage of these experiments, which were conducted over several years, is poignant, as the kids struggle to delay gratification for just a little bit longer. Some cover their eyes with their hands or turn around so that they can’t see the tray. Others start kicking the desk, or tug on their pigtails, or stroke the marshmallow as if it were a tiny stuffed animal.

As illustration, take a look at this:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWW1vpz1ybo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6]

But what about the crime?
A study – from the University of Wales at Cardiff published in the October issue of British Journal of Psychiatry hypothesized: “…that excessive confectionery consumption increases the likelihood of violence in adulthood.”
To test this hypothesis, the researchers used the British Cohort Study to obtain information on the frequency of sweets consumption at age 10 and on violence convictions by age 34.
They found that 69% of people convicted of violence had in fact eaten sweets nearly every day when they were younger. Only 42% of those who had been nonviolent until age 34 reported such daily consumption.
The researchers conclude:

One plausible mechanism is that persistently using confectionery to control childhood behaviour might prevent children from learning to defer gratification, in turn biasing decision processes towards more impulsive behaviour, biases that are strongly associated with delinquency. Furthermore, childhood confectionery consumption may nurture a taste that is maintained into adulthood, exposing adults to the effects of additives often found in sweetened food, the consumption of which may also contribute towards adult aggression. Moreover, although parental attitudes were associated with adult violence, the effect of diet was robust having controlled for these attitudinal variables. Irrespective of the causal mechanism, which warrants further attention, targeting resources at improving childhood diet may improve health and reduce aggression.

You can make of that what you will.

Meanwhile back to the marshmallows. Here is in a TEDtalk by Joachim de Posado that includes footage of children being faced with the cruel choice of eat now or hold back and eat more later.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0yhHKWUa0g&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6]

Critical thinking, Education, Future, Motivation, Psychology, Research

2 Comments

Objects of desire

Objectified - a film about the creative process of influential product designers – those people who create the “must have” gadgets and those design upgrades to toilet brushes and other quotidian items that Daniel Pink spoke of in A Whole New Mind. The film explores our complex relationship with manufactured objects and, by extension, the people who design them. It’s a look at the creativity of the designers who create the future by re-inventing the world of made objects And it’s about the stuff we have and the stuff we desire and therefore about who we are – our personal taste, style and expression – consumerism, and sustainability. What does what we have tell us about who we are and who we want to be?

Here’s a trailer of Gary Hustwit’s documentary Objectified.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9E2D2PaIcI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

Creativity, Future, Identity, Technology

0 Comments

Why school?

We go to school to become economically competitive as individuals and as a nation.
Is that all? Why do we go to school?
Here’s Mike Rose talking about his new book: Why School? Reclaiming education for all of us.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcpElcBVYKM&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6]

21st century schools, Education, Learning, Many minds, Professional Development

0 Comments

Seven suggestions for messy times

This morning’s presenter at NYSAIS – Mark Hurst – author of Bit Literacy

And here they are: the techniques to liberate ourselves from enslaving technologies:
1. Empty your inbox every day. And he promises this is doable and easy. Delete, delete, delete, store, move to action list.
2. Use a single to-do list.
3. Do one thing at a time. (See the Stanford study on multi-tasking. Result: Even the best multi-taskers don’t do anything very well. It’s more respectful as well as more efficient.)
4. Learn to type. The QWERTY keyboard layout was designed deliberately to slow down too fast typing in the day of mechanical typewriters. It slows you down. Learn to touch type with DVORAK. It’s faster, easier to learn and much more comfortable.
5. Manage your media diet. Know what you want to consume and why. Then don’t feel guilty. Learn the skill of managing the mix without overload.
6. Make room for creativity. This is why steps 1-5 are important. It’s all about making room and finding time for creativity.

“I tap-dance to work, and when I get there it’s tremendous fun.”- Warren Buffett.

7. Take time off. Take time off every day. Be in control of technology not the other way around.
“…the Elements of Style for the digital age.”
- Seth Godin on Bit Literacy.

Change, Technology

3 Comments

Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns

Listen to this podcast interview with Clayton Christensen – one of the authors of Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns - A crash course in the business of learning-from the bestselling author of The Innovator’s Dilemma and The Innovator’s Solution.[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaXmAmj1nb8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6]

21st century schools, Change, Diversity, Education, Future, Intelligence, Learning, Many minds

0 Comments

The site of the Head of School at Poughkeepsie Day School

Author Archives: thecompasspoint