Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Myspace button
Linkedin button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button

Here they come…National Standards

National Standards kindergarten through 12th grade are on their way.

At PDS we are looking forward to taking a good look at all the standards  and at where we converge, and diverge, in the choices we make. And also, at where we exceed and expand  national (and international) expectations.

As an accredited independent school we have the ability to think broadly and deeply about the choices and decisions we make. Our thinking is always guided by our mission and vision, our experience and by a review of the best thinking and research about what it means to educate children to thrive  and succeed in this rapidly changing world.

As always, we welcome your ideas.

“If a school fulfills its mission there must be constant evolution…”

It is quite possible that the assigning of grades to school children and college students as a kind of reward or punishment is useless or worse…

I’ve discovered an absolute treasure trove of fascinating material: Popular Science has put its entire 137 year archive on line.

The quotation above is from Examinations, Grades and Credits by Professor J.McKeen Cattell of Columbia University. And the date?  March 1905.

In this same edition there’s a piece on how immigrants are inspected at Ellis Island, cacti, Galileo and an argument in favor of adopting the metric system.

Several decades later – November 1957 – there’s another great education piece offering a test to parents to grade how schools are teaching science. It has some interesting suggestions for improving physics teaching.

How well does your youngster’s school teach science?

The future of your child demands solid training in the sciences. Is he (sic) getting it? Here’s how to tell.

Of course – the Soviet Union had launched Sputnik the month before and the nation was in a frenzy about staying competitive and fearful of falling behind in the arms and space race.

Also in 1905 there is the first  President Roosevelt’s address to the National Education Association. Mostly it’s an admonition to teachers to avoid stirring up class enmity and envy of the rich. He champions the virtues of being poorly paid while declaring:

You teachers make the whole world your debtors….If you – you teachers – did not do your work well this republic would not endure beyond the span of the generation.

And then – because it is our 75th year at PDS – I had to look up 1934.  Just look at the range of  topics in this one copy- – only 15cents and NRA – we do our part on the cover!

The articles and advertisements are a window to different era.  There’s the sheer range of topics and then the advice on do-it-yourself home improvements and plenty of the wonder of scientific discovery.

And don’t miss those ads – everything from 1930’s social anxiety about being too skinny and body odor to how to calm your jangling nerves with a Camel.

And all the tools and plans for building things at home and all the wonder gadgets, modern marvels and the purely bizarre: Girl Fights Octopus for Underwater Movie.

There’s even a radio kit ad ad that touts progressive education methods – learning by doing.

Together with all the reports of amazing discoveries, new inventions and build-it-yourself advice that span the decades there are quaint and curious  articles about education dating to the 19th century full of earnest pleas for moral education and modern methods.

You can track the long history of anxiety about science and math teaching in school with a simple search.  And there are pieces on coeducation, kindergarten and the “proven” uselessness of freehand drawing. Art in school is a total waste of time and money it seems when compared with the value of mechanical drawing. From November 1897:

But some things, it seems, never change: See for example Determining Educational Values from  October 1914. Change the language a little for a contemporary reader and you have a ready made article on current teaching and learning controversy. Look at this from the last paragraph:

If a school fulfills its mission there must be constant evolution…

Now that’s statement that could have been the centerpiece tagline for the NAIS  Annual Conference in San Francisco last month.

On that subject, more anon.

Transformation

“School reform today is like a freight train, and I’m out on the tracks saying, ‘You’re going the wrong way!’ ”

I’ve always respected Diane Ravitch even as I have often disagreed with her.  And her on-line and ongoing exchanges with Deborah Meier Bridging Differences have been a model of intelligent debate conducted with an informed  civility conspicuously absent from most public discourse.

And now she has written a book that is causing quite the stir. Time to get a copy.

You can read about the controversy in today’s NYTimes: Scholar’s School Reform U-Turn Shakes Up Debate

The Ruben’s Tube: Dancing Fire

It’s always great when a student or a teacher sends along a report, picture or a video of something cool going on in the classroom.

Or, as in this case, a cool experiment during vacation.

This is a first attempt at creating a Ruben’s standing wave flame tube showing the relationship between sound waves and air pressure. It looks quite hazardous and not to be tried at home without guidance, permission and precaution.

Wikipedia explains it this way – or you could just ask Jake or Preston or another physics student.

The Extra Mile

The Art History class took off for Italy last week.

It’s well over 4,000 miles from Poughkeepsie to Zurich and on to Florence but here’s the extra mile: Wayne created these books – in Florentine red – one for every student. It’s for notes,sketches and reference on the trip.

The sleeve at the back has a map of the city with their hotel marked. On the very European squared paper is a brief guide to the city’s art and architecture.

The group left on Thursday. By Saturday Bernadette had posted  pictures of the first day. And, as you can see, the notebooks are being put to work.

Science and technology heroes

It was Dean Kamen -  the inventor of the Segway and a version of the artificial heart – who established F.I.R.S.T.*  His vision was:

“To transform our culture by creating a world where science and technology are celebrated and where young people dream of becoming science and technology heroes.”

Last year we introduced lego robotics to 5th and 6th grade science. This year we started an after school lego robotics team. And yesterday we hosted a qualifying tournament for the second annual Hudson Valley F.I.R.S.T.* lego league. Many thanks to John Houston for bringing this event to PDS and working so tirelessly with the teams.

The theme for the 2009-2010 season is “Smart Move” and teams investigated many aspects of transportation systems including missions related to transportation safety, collecting objects, manipulating them, and transporting them to different locations.

Gracious professionalism and fun – the words are from the Hudson Valley F.I.R.S.T. lego league creed that also espouses teamwork, learning with mentors, friendly competition, discovery and sharing. They were all on display at PDS yesterday as the teams took over Gilkeson with their robots, models, umpires and team spirit. And thanks to parent volunteers led by Mimica Hyman, we welcomed them not just with open arms but with a cornucopia of baked goods, pizza and customized table decorations. Quite amazing.

Tournament director George Swain writes:

What a day it was!  Twelve Hudson Valley teams from as nearby as Wappingers Falls, Millbrook and Rhinebeck and as far afield as Ballston Spa and Albany came to PDS.  PDS brought three junior teams and one senior team to participate.  Senior teams competed in four areas: robot design, teamwork, research and robot performance.

Our senior team won FIRST PRIZE in the research competition.

Congratulations to all PDS students who participated and volunteered their time. Special thanks to coaches Bryan Del Bene and John Houston and to volunteers Emma Sears, Laura Graceffa, Steve Mallet, David Held, Aaron Lieberman, Debby McLean, as well as Mimica Hyman, Mark Schlessman, Beth Brofman, Alaster McLean and the many other parents who made this event such a success.

The gym, the Chapman Room and Gilkeson classrooms  were transformed as teams demonstrated their expertise in the four categories: robot performance, robot design, research presentation and teamwork. We were delighted to welcome all the teams,  their coaches and supporters and also to welcome Dr. Casimer DeCusatis, Founder and Director, of the  League and Distinguished Engineer at  IBM Corp, Poughkeepsie, NY.

More photographs on the PDS Facebook page. Check it out, become a fan.

* F.I.R.S.T. = For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology.

“What ails thee Jock?”

By now you have probably been sent a link to, or have even read, Playing to Learn – Susan Engel’s oped in the NYTimes last week. In addition to the fluttering  in my twittersphere, I received notice from a teacher, an alumna, and an administrator at PDS as well as the head of a neighboring school. And no surprise:  Engel outlines a research-based curriculum recipe for success that you can find in many good schools and certainly at PDS.

And if you haven’t read it, now is a good time. It’s short, to the point and important.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration is set to pour money into a renewed focus on school success, failure and assessment in the well-intentioned but misdirected “race to the top”. It’s an unfortunate metaphor. A race means winners and losers when what we really need is for all children to be educated and to succeed.  We need a “team effort to the top” to make a collective climb to higher levels of literacy and numeracy not a sharper elbows scramble for scarce rations.

This No Child Left Untested policy suggests that test scores are the desired and final outcome of education. It will ensure that teachers increasingly teach to the tests, and that assessment and measuring become the focus of the curriculum and time in school. The truth is that improving test scores can never take the place of actually educating children.

Also last week New York Magazine had a cover story The Myth of the Gifted Child that excoriates the notion that four year olds can be tested effectively for giftedness, intellectual ability and potential.  This is a magazine that relishes the opportunity to tweak the obsessions of the elite and its The Junior Meritocracy did just that asking:  “Should a child’s fate be sealed by an exam he takes at the age of 4? Why kindergarten-admission tests are worthless, at best.”

Reading about the testers’ interactions with small children I wondered what they would have made of Thomas Babington Macauley, the eminent and erudite 19th century scholar, writer, barrister and politician. The story is probably apocryphal but here is one version:

Legends surround the first words of Macauley…. He famously did not utter a word until around age 4 when he turned to a wailing baby and asked, “What ails thee Jock?”

In another version the four year old Macauley soon speaks again, and in characteristic style:

While he was dining one day with his father and mother at the house of a neighbor the servant upset a cup of coffee on his legs. On his hostess’s inquiry as to whether he was hurt, the young Thomas immediately replied: “Madam, the agony is somewhat abated.”

The British humorist Frank Muir is said to have commented, rather uncharitably, “I think the temptation to spill coffee on such a child must have been quite strong.”

Annoying brat, child prodigy, neither or both, I don’t think Macauley would have impressed the testing psychologists.

Where are the adults?

Teacher of the Year Anthony Mullen has another excellent Road Diary post today.  At Kent State University, Ohio,  he walks down a grassy slope looking back at the spot where, almost forty years ago, the National Guard stood in line to confront student war protesters.  And then the  fatal 13 seconds that left four students dead.

Those Guardsmen and the students they confronted were close in age, not far beyond childhood. And  Mullen asks: “Where are the adults? Why weren’t adults standing where I am standing now?”

Edith Skipper, 89, with her computer

Perhaps for those who lived through those turbulent times the questions seems naive. In any event,  that interdiction did not happen.

“A generation of young people was left to settle a nation’s conflicted soul on the soil of a Midwest college campus. The village elders and faculty arrived after the killings, and did a good job preventing more bloodshed. But they arrived too late….”

Where are the adults? On Friday a NY Times Room for Debate presented a similar question:  Wired Kids, Negligent Parents? And while much of the eye-rolling commentary that followed brought King Canute to mind,  the question remains: Where are the grown-ups?  While there is nothing wrong with either,  computers are not just for entertainment delivery and gaming.  The potential is for empowerment, independence, community and creativity not mere consumption,

When it comes to the digital revolution, our children need guidance, example and sometimes intervention.  They don’t have a choice about whether to get involved with digital technology.  Unless they opt to be hermits living completely off the grid it is their world. This is a new frontier and adults and children are together at the threshold. It’s not about prohibition and control but rather example and leadership. We have at our disposal incomparable tools for learning – collaboration, change, creation and communication.

What are we doing with that unparalleled opportunity? And that challenge?

Is it  time for the generational abdication to end?  No more natives and immigrants?  Maybe the divide is less generational than aptitude for learning.  Can it now be  about possibility, innovation and change (for the better)?  – learning what we can do with what is now available to all of us.  Can we do it together?

Where are the adults?  What should we be doing and how should we behave?

“I know you are into technology …”

Well – yes – I suppose I am, and I always have been.

Swindon Town Hall and Library

As I child I haunted the school library and, while I didn’t quite read every book, I was certainly familiar with every shelf. I had a town library card at five and usually reached the limit of two fiction and one nonfiction book per visit, which was every week. (Who makes up these rules? Very frustrating to have to find something in non-fiction when there were scores of Enid Blytons yet to be consumed.  This was before librarians as a tribe went on a misguided tirade against Blyton, who, single handedly, brought more children to reading as a habit than any other author of her era.)

And then – when I could afford my own books – I loved bookshops new and old, and spend hours ferreting out oddities in stores specializing in the second hand and out of print.

And of course I really like fountain pens, pencil boxes, good notebooks and stationery. And, in an early claim to administrative fame I was once the classroom ink monitor until I was displaced by the arrival in schools of a new writing technology – the biro, the ballpoint pen.

But that of course is not what the teacher meant by that title statement. Not books, pens, paper but machines, computers, laptops, digital equipment.

Sometimes these conversations remind of some I used to have around the topic of spelling and grammar back when I was an English teacher. If I didn’t assign spelling lists to be memorized, or exercises to parse sentences into grammatical pieces I would be asked, “Don’t you think spelling matters? Or don’t you think children need to write well?”

And of course spelling and usage are important. It was just my considered understanding that writing something that mattered was a better use of classroom time and a more effective way to teach those very skills.

Dawn from the PDS carpark

So I’m not into technology if that means studying the parts of the computer or if it replaces time outdoors and other forms of active playing. But I am into computers if it means we have access to incomparable learning tools for collaboration, creation and communication.

There are a thousand and one reasons to love libraries, books and digital technology. And for me, most of them have to do with learning and what they enable us to do. Such as show you this sunrise as seen from the school car park this morning.

Advanced Pressure and the Race to Nowhere

video.nytimes.com
The problem with Advanced Placement classes and how they are destroying the lives of high school students.

This video features students and educators from the film Race To Nowhere – a film that takes a look at education, childhood and the unintended consequences of the achievement and test obsessed way of life that permeates American education and culture. The pressure on kids is unrelenting and is creating a generation suffering from unprecedented levels of stress, depression and burnout. No wonder 2,000 kids a day drop out of high school.

There are better ways to educate for success and a lifetime of learning!

My First Comic

Inspired by Teach Paperless.

Made using Make Beliefs Comix

Truthy quotes: The best and the bogus

Alan Fletcher

A good quotation is like the perfect tweet – short, pithy, memorable, wise and wonderful. The the tip of an iceberg of meaning it captures something much bigger than itself with a few well chosen words in the right order. No wonder then we have all become addicted to the quotation as token of our thinking. the shorthand signal for where we stand.

Take for example this one attributed to W.B. Yeats:

“Education is not the filling  of a pail but the lighting of a fire.”

Great sentiment, oft quoted. But where did Yeats say that?  Nowhere so far as I can tell.

In a similar vein there’s this attributed to Plutarch:

“The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled.”

Beyond lists of quotations, can anyone help out with the provenance?

And, on the other hand,  “Does it matter?” – Siegfried Sassoon.

So here are a few more really famous quotations that I have just made up. Is it  George Orwell? B.F. Skinner? the CEO of McGraw-Hill?  William Wordsworth?  Alfie Kohn?

What are you favorite quotes that have yet to be attributed to someone famous?

“Uneasy lies the head that teaches to the test.”

“When it comes to education, politicians should stick to their knitting.’

“In a sane world everyone would make art.”

“Teaching paperless is the pipedream of the deluded.’

“Social technology is the death knell of progressive education.”

“Little we see in technology that is ours.’”

“You can fill a bucket with smoke but you can make it drink.”

“No good tweet goes unsung.”

“All the test scores are as nothing if we lose the joy of learning.’

“A child needs a  computer like a fish needs a bicycle.”

What are your favorite quotes that have yet to be attributed to someone famous?

February 10th 2010: Thomas Jefferson update: It appears that words and axioms are often attributed to Jefferson without a shred of evidence. here’s one that seems quite spurious:  “There is nothing more unequal than the equal treatment of unequal people.”

“Can we have a bake sale?”

“George, can we have a bake sale?”

That was Wednesday last week, in the hallway, right at the start of school. And this afternoon we wired a check for $1124 to the Red Cross.

It’s over a week now since we first heard the news of the catastrophic consequences of the earthquake in Haiti.  That very morning, first thing, students began planning what they could do to help send relief.

This morning dozens of students in grades 5 through 12 gathered in the Kenyon Center to brainstorm ways to support the relief efforts in Haiti.

All week I overheard fragments of conversation among high schoolers as they gathered first thing in Kenyon. They pieced together elements of the story involving the history, infrastructure, politics, economics and culture of Haiti and the science of earthquakes as they began to spin out ideas for how they could raise money and help.

One student is organizing a benefit concert and has put together an impressive group of musicians, found a donated space and set up a Facebook page to promote the event. Other initiatives are in the works.

In morning meetings students began to pool their ideas and share their reactions. Students urged each other to text a Red Cross donation via their  cell phones . (“Don’t forget to check with the account holder,” one voice cautioned.)

The brainstorming meeting this morning focused on how to distinguish immediate and intermediate relief from a longer term commitment. There was no shortage of ideas, suggestions and options for ways forward. They worked on organizing strategies and how best to continue their thinking in smaller meetings and online using the PDS Ning to connect, share and communicate.

And as I listened I was impressed by the depth of caring, thoughtful attention and intelligence these young people ages 10-18 brought to this task.  They had taken on the tasks of learning, of emotional resilience and mindful, informed action. They care. They want to act intelligently.

This week we have celebrated the life and legacy of Martin Luther King. In 1947 – when he was a teenager – he wrote in his college newspaper:  “Intelligence plus character – that is the goal of true education.”

Intelligence and character – the young people in that room this morning demonstrated both as they grappled with the interconnections, complexities and ambiguities of the crisis in Haiti. This was problem solving and leadership at its best, and with no easy set of immediate hand-me-down answers.

Intelligence and character: These qualities are not unique to students at PDS.  I know that in schools across the world children have been responding to this crisis and doing remarkable things. Young people everywhere have this potential and this same desire to make the world a better place. That is my experience. And of course, they are qualities not confined to the young. We all have that potential. That is a source of hope

The Children’s Machine

A second grader needed a place to hang out and my office was available. The conversation went somewhat like this:

“Make yourself at home. I’ve not got much for you to do but there are a few toys and books if you want.”

“Do you have a spare laptop?”

“No sorry, I don’t.  But what a good idea.”

“What sort of laptop do you use? I’ve got my own website. I made it.”

“You did? What have you got on it?”

“It’s about comics. Have you got videos on your website? I just learned how to add You Tube. Want me to show you? You can’t search for it on a search engine but I can tell you the address. I can put it into your browser. What one do you use?”

Nimble one handed fingers fly over the keyboard of my laptop and up it comes: A website with several pages and some embedded videos.

“Which is your favorite video. Would you show me?’

We watched Charlie the Unicorn 2 where, among other things, Charlie is urged to put a banana in his ear. Pretty funny.

“I’ve got a laptop at home. I use it to find stuff out and sometimes play some games. I also write documents. What browser do you use. I use Safari. Want to see?’

Agile fingers again, pulling up links and programs with confident ease

“Do you know how to use the webcam.”

“I don’t.

“Want me to show you. Let me look in the list. Here it is.” Cursor now pointing to Integrated Camera.

“You have itunes?  Do you have an ipod? What sort of ipod do you have?

“I don’t know what sort. It’s about the size of this iphone.”

“Does it have a touch screen. Sounds like it’s a mini What apps do you have on your phone?  Let me see. You’ve got Safari.  My mom has a droid and it goes ‘droid’ like a robot when it comes on. It’s really cool. Do you know how to make a slide show with music?

“Yes”

“I want to do that. Can you show me? I have a gmail account. Can you send me the link to the program you use?  You can go on my website to send me a message.”

At that point the conversation veered off to the technicalities of the rivalries between the Yankees and the Red Sox and why Phillies fans don’t like Mets fans and what it’s like at the new stadium. And then it was time to go back to class.

Centuries ago (well 1993) Seymour Papert called the computer The Children’s Machine.

He was right.

Hoover that google

With google now declared the word of the decade, tweet the word of the year and unfriend now officially in the OED, the English language is clearly still on the move.

When it comes to brand name eponyms some make it, some don’t. In the UK at least hoover is a familiar verb but here is one that did not make it into the lexicon in spite of serious efforts by the advertising industry.

So if we don’t use the verb “to Kodak”, it wasn’t for the lack of effort on the part of the company that created a brand familiarity for the 20th century at least.

What’s interesting about these vintage ads is not just the effort to make turn Kodak into an eponymous verb, but the illustrations:

Children and technology taking pictures, setting up scenes and creating photographic stories with toys as props and companions as characters.

And the ad copy:  “There’s education in taking the pictures.”

Bash Street Pols

From the Beano (UK comic) - Bash Street Kids bashing teacher and resisting learning for 50 years

Could it be that some of the harping on 21st century skills and the need for 21st century schools is partly a political pretext for the ignorant and arrogant to bash and trash teachers and schools?

Just a thought in response to Teacher of the Year Anthony Mullen’s Road Diaries in Teacher Magazine.

Teachers should be seen and not heard”.

“What do you think?” the senator asked.

Where do I begin?

I spent the last thirty minutes listening to a group of arrogant and condescending non educators disrespect my colleagues and profession. I listened to a group of disingenuous people whose own self-interests guide their policies rather than the interests of children. I listened to a cabal of people who sit on national education committees that will have a profound impact on classroom teaching practices. And I heard nothing of value.

“I’m thinking about the current health care debate, “I said. “And I am wondering if I will be asked to sit on a national committee charged with the task of creating a core curriculum of medical procedures to be used in hospital emergency rooms.”

Everyone went to school so so everyone is an expert on education. And teachers and educators are routinely dismissed and their expertise and experience cast aside.

The Carrot and the Cattleprod

Many years ago I wrote an article with the title The Carrot and the Cattleprod.  It’s so long ago that although I wrote it on a word processor I no longer have an electronic copy.  It’s buried and yellowing deep in a file cabinet somewhere in the basement.

So I don’t know where it is but I do remember what it was about. Influenced no doubt by Alfie Kohn’s  Punishments and Rewards it argued that incentives and painful goads had no place in learning and no place in school.

The carrots and cattleprods were the grades and empty praise that so many seem to believe essential to student motivation. It took tangential swipe at grading systems so byzantine, flawed and gameable that they reflect neither product nor process. And what a distraction from learning.  And what a waste of time.

I wrote it because I was tired of all the justifications for grades that said that they are needed motivators for students. (If that were to be the case, who is responsible for their loss of the love of learning?).

I wrote it because I was tired of the family conferences where the conversation would inevitably drift from the learning to the grade.  And I wrote it because of all those tedious dead-end debates about grade inflation and what an “A” really means.

I was arguing against grades. To get rid of them.  I did not win that battle – that kind of institutional risk taking and change in education is rare. It’s rare even when the majority know it is the right thing to do.  And not all my readers agreed it was the right thing. To some, moving away from grades must seem like writing free verse to Robert Frost – “tennis with the net down”.  Pointless.  Change is  scary and the status quo imperfect, but cozy.  And anyway – teachers are the people who generally got good grades in school – so what can be wrong with them? And standards, and quality, and excellence etc. We just need to get the assessment system right and assign grades accordingly.

And now here comes Daniel Pink following in Kohn’s footprints but from a business perspective.  I have not read Drive yet but I did watch the TEDtalk preview.

Pink speaks of the need to “tap into the deeply human need to direct our own lives to learn and create new things and to do better by ourselves and the world” This age, he says, “requires us to upgrade autonomy, mastery and purpose. And he calls on 40 years of science to show that carrot and stick motivators just don’t work.

And just to pile it on about motivation here is the Harvard Business review on the same topic: Breakthrough Ideas for 2010: What Really Motivates Workers.

Turns out, that according to these careful researchers, it’s not the big bonuses and salaries that motivate but a sense of accomplishment and progress. If it works for business, why not learning?  And of course, we know it does work. The evidence is there for the finding. So what’s getting in the way of schools applying what we know?

Show an affirming flame

On the last day of the year, time to show an affirming flame as another low dishonest decade ends. I’ll leave all the best and worst and top ten lists to others, but merely remark – that for all the base mendacity in the real world, life in school remains a place of joy and possibility.

The words and phrases in italics are from W.H. Auden who wrote them as the world was sliding into war and people were uncertain and afraid. He was preoccupied with an enlightenment driven away, and a world of habit forming pain, mismanagement and grief.

That was 1930’s and the real world.

But that decade also saw the opening of PDS – a school founded in hope and built on the belief that children deserve a focus on what matters most. Back then, those founding parents and educators wanted a school where children would be able to uncover their unique aptitudes and abilities. They wanted a school where children would learn the habits and attitudes of lifetime learning and ethical action.

School is not the real world. And that is how it should be for that world is all too often unstructured, unsafe, chaotic and bereft of coherent values. School is not like that. It is, however, the best preparation to thrive in that world and make a positive contribution.

The anecdotal evidence on this is quite clear. Perhaps in 2010 there will be time to actually get the data.

Happy New Year everyone.

Born to help

Turns out that we may be hard wired to co-operate and help out. And this behavior occurs in children before, and in the absence of, specific training and in babies as early as  twelve months. Biologists are concluding that even infants are innately sociable and helpful to others.

And it’s not a matter of etiquette and social training and it’s not about rewards.

Did you catch the  NYTimes article We may be born with an urge to help on altruism and selfishness in children?

It’s research that certainly fits with my experience of children at school – they are all too happy to lend a hand when something, or somebody, needs their help and there is a ready fund of goodwill toward others that is easily tapped.  Students at every level are eager to assist each other and to be a part of a community project. It’s why service learning is not about resume building to enhance college prospects but a genuine desire to make a difference.

For those of an idealistic bent, these are supportive findings. Helping others and reaching out, it seems, are not something  to be imposed. Rather we have a natural inclination to cooperate, share and help others. But – that said – doesn’t it make sense to build social institutions – schools – on those principles? That way, the social norms of group membership can develop and help shape these natural inclinations.   A school culture of kindness and cooperation is not built on punishments, rewards, rules and regulations but rather on shared expectations and intentions. These are what strengthen and shape behavior. Shared intentions are what make us human.


In “Why We Cooperate,” a book published in October, Dr. Michael Tomasello, a developmental psychologist, and co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany writes:

“Shared intentionality… is close to the essence of what distinguishes people from chimpanzees. A group of human children will use all kinds of words and gestures to form goals and coordinate activities, but young chimps seem to have little interest in what may be their companions’ minds.”

What are the implications for parenting and schools?

According to Dr. Tomasello it’s a matter of simply communicating with children about the effect of their actions on others and emphasizing the logic of social cooperation.

“Children are altruistic by nature,” he writes, and though they are also naturally selfish, all parents need do is try to tip the balance toward social behavior.

“Humans putting their heads together in shared cooperative activities are thus the originators of human culture.”

The article cites other researchers whose findings complement his work.

In “The Age of Empathy.” Dr. Frans de Waal writes: “We’re preprogrammed to reach out. Empathy is an automated response over which we have limited control.”

So if it is in our nature to be sociable and cooperative what about war? And what about The Lord of the Flies and all that other good stuff that reveals the plain truth that we are not always so nice to each other? The article explains it this way:

Social structure requires that things be done to maintain it, some of which involve negative attitudes toward others. The instinct for enforcing norms is powerful, as is the instinct for fairness. ….

“Humans clearly evolved the ability to detect inequities, control immediate desires, foresee the virtues of norm following and gain the personal, emotional rewards that come from seeing another punished,” write three Harvard biologists, Marc Hauser, Katherine McAuliffe and Peter R. Blake, in reviewing their experiments with tamarin monkeys and young children.

If people do bad things to others in their group, they can behave even worse to those outside it. Indeed the human capacity for cooperation “seems to have evolved mainly for interactions within the local group,” Dr. Tomasello writes.

Sociality, the binding together of members of a group, is the first requirement of defense, since without it people will not put the group’s interests ahead of their own or be willing to sacrifice their lives in battle. Lawrence H. Keeley, an anthropologist who has traced aggression among early peoples, writes in his book “War Before Civilization” that, “Warfare is ultimately not a denial of the human capacity for cooperation, but merely the most destructive expression of it.”

The roots of human cooperation may lie in human aggression. We are selfish by nature, yet also follow rules requiring us to be nice to others.

“That’s why we have moral dilemmas,” Dr. Tomasello said, “because we are both selfish and altruistic at the same time.”

Not seeing this altruism and helpfulness at home?  Have a sense of disconnect when you hear from teachers about behavior in school that does not altogether match what happens around the chores at home? The article has an explanation for that too.