Come Play the Way we Learn

Billboard on Hooker Avenue - designed by Ray Schwartz

Come play the way we learn – it’s an invitation and it’s on a billboard right there on Hooker Avenue*.

The invitation is to the big event we have coming up on Saturday – Fall Festival  Reimagined.

I love that invitation because it strikes right at the heart of the negative stereotype that I heard so much about when I arrived at PDS (aka Poughkeepsie Play School).

FFR is all about imagination, ingenuity, innovation invention. It’s all build, hack, hammer, glue, make, design, tweak, tinker and play.

If you listen to FFR vision and concept coordinator Catherine Harris she can give you the big picture but the truth is in the tag line: “It’s what we already do”.   Because at  its best PDS is all about play. And play is something we are deadly serious about because play is not just for toddlers and athletes.

I’ve written about play many times on this blog because learning is all about play. To learn we think, make, do, team and tinker – with ideas and with things.

Switch on the capacity to play

  • Play happens in the space between where we are – and  – where we can be.
  • Play is the bridge that connects what we know and do now, with what we can know and do next.
  • Play makes the leap to growth and learning possible and makes it memorable and enduring.
  • Play is a deadly serious intellectual activity.

Building the labyrinth in math class

Scientific research is all playing. Invention is the result of logically organized idle curiosity.**

At PDS we do a lot of playing because it’s in the play of ideas, in the play of working together, in the flex  that we find the sweetspot where  we expand our knowledge and understanding. That’s where we build the capacity for the future.

So Poughkeepsie Play School?  Whatever.

As if education is only valuable when it’s akin to grinding of teeth on steel bolts.  If it doesn’t hurt, taste bad and make you miserable it can’t be any good. Where did those ideas ever come from other than our own less than joyful schooling?

Don’t get me wrong – learning can be hard work, and struggling and effort matter. And the disappointment of trying and failing can be tough.  But pain is not the purpose.

So: Come play the way we learn and learn the way we play. See you on Saturday November 19th.

And – for all of you who want FFR to last forever – Saul Griffith’s  A Curriculum of Toys

Checking out the ramps for Saturday

Giant monster eating a person

* Close to the site of the original house purchased in 1934 as the first home of Poughkeepsie Day School. Now the Georgetown Square apartments on the corner of Hooker and South Grand.

** Chris Holford, my brother the retired physics prof and tinkerer par excellence.

 

More Failing, Fewer Failures, Greater Success

The November Educational Leadership is devoted to the topic of grading. It includes an article by Alfie Kohn an expanded version of which you can read here: The Case Against Grades.

I’ve given grades. For years I worried about how to get a system right, tried to focus students and their parents on the learning not the grade. I’ve spent countless hours in the foolish pursuit of a better way to grade, the discussion of grade inflation, and what an “A” really means and all the rest of the other distractions from learning.

The more I think about learning, about how children  thrive and about what we – as a society – must ask our schools to do, then the more I know that all the traditional practices of grading and testing -  and all the revamped shiny new versions – are emphatically not what we need

Grades don’t help us learn; they don’t help us try harder; they don’t help us compete; they don’t give us useful information about what to do; and they don’t serve the needs of our learners in school.

We all know learning is about growth. We now all know that knowledge is abundant  to anyone with access to an internet connection. So what we need is what we have always needed: a learning -growth mindset.

And learning  – think about it – is about trial and error. It’s risky. It’s stepping out there. It’s doing something new.  (Think about the child learning to crawl, to walk, to run. It means failing and falling. And along the way the child is cheered, encouraged, supported and successful.)

Learning means failing.

Forty years ago in Wad-ja-get? The grading game in American education  Howard Kirschenbaum, Rodney Napier and Sidney B. Simon  wrote about the corrosive effect of grades on learning. It was true then. It’s true now.

We need kids to grow as learners – doers, thinkers,  makers, creators.  We do not need more test taking successes and failures.

We need real-world problems solved by more people – working together -  whose diverse abilities are called upon to help.

This means more failing and fewer failures. And more success.

Effective Grading Practices? I think that’s an oxymoron.

 

 

Occupy Education: The Revolution Starts Now

As always, lots of good stuff in the latest edition of Independent School, the quarterly magazine from NAIS.

And those who hold rather outdated notions of independent schools as universal staunch defenders of tradition and the home of the status quo might be surprised by the theme:  Evolution or Revolution: the Pace of Change in Schools.

Evolution or revolution? – both suggest that things are on the move, change is afoot and the status quo is to be questioned, challenged or perhaps  overturned.

In the end, it seems,  education and schools are not immune from the whirlwind – fueled by technology -  that has upended virtually every other industry. (Think music, medicine, publishing, news media, communications, manufacturing and etc.) That glacial pace is picking up.

The magazine includes this call to arms by  Elizabeth Coleman, the president of Bennington College and  an NAIS trustee: The Revolution Starts Now.

Coleman wrote this before the #OccupyWallStreet movement took root in downtown Manhattan – indeed she delivered a version of this at the NAIS annual conference last spring -  but  it resonates with the sources of that discontent and remains important and timely.

Elizabeth Coleman is not one to mince words. She begins with  inescapable brutal facts that:

During the past decade, we have witnessed escalating crises in the most vital areas of our public life, including: a relentless acceleration in our awesome failure to effectively educate vast numbers of our young; a no-less-relentless increase in the spectacular inequities in the distribution of wealth; an extraordinary timidity, to put it politely, in our approach to providing health care; a growing incapacity to discuss, much less confront, the potential of global warming to upend human civilization itself; an assault on the principles that define us as a people (the rule of law, the separation of powers, the relationship between church and state); a disconcerting predilection for the uses of force despite overwhelming evidence of its limitations; and a squandering of our material and ethical resources in less than a decade that defies credulity.

And at a time when clarity of thought, respect for evidence, and appreciation for complexity is especially critical, the sensationalism of the media — the other major educational institution in our society — continues undiminished. The distance we have traveled is best measured by reminding ourselves that the Federalist Papers were published in three New York newspapers and then, in response to popular demand, published in newspapers throughout the colonies. There is no more damning evidence of the failure of education in this country than the quality of what the public craves or tolerates in its media.

While Coleman sees a crisis,  the academic establishment, she says,  moves on as if oblivious to the tumult and chaos; education is increasingly defined in economic and vocational terms while the health of the democracy is left to languish. Education, she laments is seen not as an intrinsic value but as a handmaiden to political, economic and religious interests and remains “… a blank slate on which virtually anything can be written.”

Coleman sees the purpose of education as being not to perpetuate the status quo but to challenge and change it for the better.

Our neglect of the distinctive power and responsibility of education is especially perilous in a democracy.

She connects this thinking with the nation’s founding philosophers:

From the beginning of this great American experiment in self-governance, education was universally understood to be critical in determining its fate. Thomas Jefferson put it most succinctly: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be….

Questions such as “What kind of a world are we making? What kind of a world should we be making? What kind of a world can we be making?” move off the table as beyond our ken. Incredibly, neutrality about such concerns is seen as a condition of academic integrity.

Coleman’s argument proceeds from there and includes the necessity – as she sees it – to take a stand on the vital issue on which democracy is founded.

Education, she says, is more than crudely vocational however lofty or urgent it is made to sound. She quotes President Bill Clinton’s State of the Union message of 1994 “We measure every school by one high standard: Are children learning what they need to know to compete and win in the global economy.”

And she asks:

That’s it? That’s the whole story?

One might reasonably consider economic well-being to be one of the desirable outcomes of a successful education, but that is a very different matter from its becoming the sole objective of such an education — the standard by which everything is to be measured.

She has much more to say on the subject and offers some ways forward and out of our current dilemma with an education focus on the compelling needs, human purpose and what it takes to educate for sustained  democracy and democratic values.

And her conclusion presents the  stark alternative: the status quo or revolution:

Finally, the world is right in its ongoing passionate commitment to the power of education, despite everything. Imagine what could happen if we do it right. Imagine what will happen if we do not. The stakes could not be higher. We are unlikely to have a viable democracy made up of experts, politicians, zealots, and spectators.

For Elizabeth Coleman  education -  aka the liberal arts and sciences -  should focus on broad subjects relevant to our immediate problems. And they are: Equity, the environment, health care, education, governance, and the uses of force. She believes that the task of  education – specifically colleges -  should be to re-engage communities around these pivotal issues and that our survival depends upon that refocus.

For some of the specifics of what she has in mind read the full essay: The Revolution Starts Now.

“Parents needed as Play Agents?… Surely You’re Joking PDS!”

If you’ve been to the webpage, read your email,  looked at Facebook or been on campus you will know that the  FFR (Fall Festival Reimagined) wing of the PA is actively recruiting older students and parents to be Play Agents for the big event on Saturday, November 19th.

Readers of this blog will know that I’m a card-carrying believer in the power of play as key intellectual activity.

Sometimes it has another name – tinkering, making, doing, thinking, creating, engaging etc. But at heart it’s all a kind of play.And play matters.

It’s play that allows us the grit to keep us sticking with whatever it is we need to do.  It’s play that puts us into direct connection with what we already know and what we need to learn next. It’s play that keeps us on the edge of what we don’t know and it’s play that puts us into relationship with others.

It’s what we mean when we say: “Connect joy to learning.”

And it’s deadly serious intellectual stuff.

Play is where imagination,  invention, innovation, connection and discovery  collide. Play is at the very core of learning.

Play is when we are in that state that psychologist Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi calls Flow and it’s what makes us happy.

For a little confirmation read this extract from Richard Feynman – Nobel Prize winner for Physics:

Uncorking the bottle: Piddling around with the wobbling plate

But when it came time to do some research. I couldn’t get to work. I was a little tired; I was not interested; I couldn’t do research! …
And then I thought to myself, “You know, what they think of you is so fantastic, it’s impossible to live up to it. You have no responsibility to live up to it!”…
Then I had another thought; Physics disgusts me a little bit now, but I used to enjoy doing physics. Why did I enjoy it? I used to play with it. I used to do whatever I felt like doing – it didn’t have to do with whether it was important for the development of nuclear physics…
So I get this new attitude … I’m going to play with physics, whenever I want to, without worrying about any importance whatsoever.
Within a week I was in the cafeteria and some guy, fooling around, throws a plate in the air. …
I had nothing to do, so I start to figure out the motion of the rotating plate…
And before I knew it (it was a very short time) I was “playing” – working, really – with the same old problem that I loved so much, that I had stopped working on when I went to Los Alamos; my thesis-type problems; all those old-fashioned wonderful things.
It was effortless. It was easy to play with these things. It was like uncorking a bottle: Everything flowed out effortlessly. …
There was no importance to what I was doing, but ultimately there was. The diagrams and the whole business that I got the Nobel Prize for came from that piddling around with the wobbling plate.

So being a Play Agent is serious stuff.TMF = Too Much Fun

The creator of kindergarten – Friedrich Froebel – said that play was the work of the child.

The moment we are off the mechanical treadmill it is also the work of all of us. If he were around now he might say something like: ” Play is not just for five year-olds anymore. In the innovation age that replaced the era of information, play is the work of us all.”

But he would say it better and he would be founding a movement as powerful, creative and life changing as a play-fueled, learning-filled  kindergarten.

Middle School Play Agents VideoSo come be a Play Agent.

I think the truth is -  these PA FFR organizers are on to something. This play stuff is not just for kids any more. And anyway, they seem to be having way too much fun. Come join in. Find your way to play.

There’s video proof of the fun right here.

Transformation

We have a new lobby in one of our buildings – the Elizabeth C. Gilkeson Center – and  as you can see from these two pictures it’s quite stunning.

This is the first place most visitors see and it’s where almost everyone passes through at least once a day and usually more often. It’s where visitors are received, students wait for buses and where their  drivers come in from the cold and and can turn off their idling engines.

It’s a place to read a book, have a conversation and watch the PDS world whirl by. In other words it’s an important place for the school community – reception area, theater foyer, display space, waiting room and  agora.

It’s a place for ideas, inspiration, imagination and invention and a place to find the company to do it all with.

It’s colorful, comfortable, appealing and attractive.  It includes the living green wall of plants and a LED monitor to help us keep track of events and stay informed. It has cabinets and wall space for display. It has room to move and  places to sit.

And – it also has an elephant. (You will have to look for that.)

This is a place of beauty where form serves function. I hope you come and see it soon. And when you see Board president Stan Lichens thank him for this transformation and let him know what you think.

“The death of education but the dawn of learning.”

Mindless and disturbing commercial hype or … finally … the opportunity to realize the long-held, unfulfilled dreams of boundless learning?

“Embrace your inner weirdness”

A parent recently sent along this article: Why geeks make better adults than the in-crowd.  The article draws it’s lead from Alexandra Robbins  book The Geeks Shall Inherit the Earth.

While there is something of a defensive, passive-aggressive revenge fantasy to the tone, it is undoubtedly true that conforming to the conventional as a way to be popular is a dead end.

It reminded me of two things.The first was a post I wrote in 2009 that was along the same lines. The second was last January’s young alumni/ae panel.

We invited college age alums to come back and talk to current high school students about college life. They offloaded a trove of invaluable expertise and good humored advice about the transition from high school.

We learned that:

Getting grades in college is no big deal
PDS really teaches you how to write and be a learner
Joining an athletic team is a great way to make friends and have fun
Owning a frying pan for making egg sandwiches and knowing how to cook  is a really good move

There was advice on how to become a research assistant, get an internships and get into the best science classes.

And then there was this on college life in general:

When you get to college, embrace your inner weirdness. We all know that PDS kids are weird and in college they will love you for it.

So I started thinking about that because I know that PDS kids are actually not weird (apologies to those invested in trying to be different for the sake of it!)

They are themselves though. And that – maybe -  is the difference. If most schooling is inclined to promote conformity and compliance through a relentless emphasis on standardized tests and narrow measures of achievement, then it is no wonder that the most successful students are those who have jumped highest through the regulation hoops.

Success at PDS is not like that.  Sure we have plenty of excellent test takers and achievers and the scores to match. But it is not the purpose of a PDS education to raise scores. The purpose of a PDS education is to raise learners. The focus is not on tests but on learning. And, because that means thinking about learners, it means recognizing and valuing the amazingly different capacities and passions of every student. Being who you are means being part of the in-crowd.

So if a school enables, encourages and educates each child to be who they are and who they might become, then it is no wonder that PDS students are “weird”. They’ve not been obsessively tested and graded and numbered and labelled.  They’ve been spared the widget factory approach to schooling and they emerge from the process as individuals on a unique journey. That’s what we strive for. Being a teenager is hard enough without the added pressure of an education designed to create alienated and isolated outsiders along with the few winners who have raced to the top.

So “embrace your inner weirdness” is comparable to “follow your passion”. We all do better and go further and deeper when we find and follow that inner drive and purpose. And in this era of innovation that spells a competitive edge. PDS kids stand out because they are who they are. Like all kids, each one is a bundle of unique qualities and not one of them is off the assembly line.

And sometimes – being conventional is where a student wants to be.  And that is just fine too. After all – with everyone else busy being different, conventional stands out.  And how PDS is that!

The Footprint and the Digital Dossier

“Reputation, reputation, reputation! O, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial. My reputation, Iago, my reputation!”

(Othello Act II.iii.262-265).

Cassio only had his own foolishness and the treachery of Iago to deal with. He didn’t have to contend with social media and the digital dossier.

Iago -  who elsewhere in the play goes on an emotional rant about his good name -  disagrees, insisting that reputation is an abstraction to be manipulated.

“Reputation is an idle and most false imposition; oft got without merit, and lost without deserving” (II.iii.268-270)

In Shakespeare, attacks on honor and dignity could be settled with the challenge of a duel. When Thomas Mowbray is accused of treason in Richard11 he declares that  without a “spotless reputation” we are but “gilded loam or painted clay”.

But back to the 21st century:

When Will Richardson said that it should be a goal of every school to ensure that its graduates “google well” he meant that they should be found on line and he was using the verb as a stand in for all search engines.

It still has the whiff of a soap powder marketing ploy, but what he is talking about is personal branding.

Schools, he says, need to teach students who not only know how to seek, find, filter and navigate information but students who can be found with the reputation they have created for themselves online.

Because we know many colleges admissions people and employers are looking, we have two options – to live off the grid or be found in the ways we want to known.

And because not being found on line may raise as many questions in the eyes of a prospective employee, that means online presence and the digital footprint.

Turns out that the recent news item about 80% of college admissions offices checking facebook profiles was not quite accurate but that doesn’t mean prospective students should not be careful about what they put on line and especially about their privacy settings.

But what Will is talking about is far more than removing some unfortunate photos before they go viral. He is talking about active online personal portfolio creation.

What impression are you making with your digital dossier?

And while you start worrying about that, consider this:  cross-platform social face recognition is on the way.  With all our constant chatter and communication we don’t need to worry about surveillance and lack of privacy – we are doing the work of Big Brother ourselves.

Take a look at Viewdl:

Here’s an interesting tool to uncover the digital footprint of your name (and all those with whom you share it). It’s Personas, an installation by Aaron Zinman at M.I.T and presented as a critique of data-mining. Enter your name and – clickety clicky – “you” are mined and then represented in a bar chart that looks like a row of military campaign medals.

This is how Poughkeepsie Day School checked out:

One Teacher’s Learning Journey with 2.0

Technology, Passion and Learning: That was the title of Shirley Rinaldi’s Prezi at Friday’s Embracing Innovation Conference ( Twitter hashtag: #eic11).

Shirley teaches 6th grade humanities and she’s worked at PDS since 1993. She writes a blog Talking the Tech Walk with another middle school teacher and you can follow their story there.

This year she has been on a teaching and learning exploration using 2.0 internet tools to enhance her humanities work  and empower her students.

The journey began at a conference two years ago. And was propelled by a tweet from the past.

But let the Prezi tell the story of that journey.

Here’s a link to her students’ class blog and below is a short video of four of those students describing their favorite tool (up to now, of course).

Outcomes and results matter: But what’s with all the testing?

In a recent post at Raining Acorns, a Pennsylvania parent records what happens in March school testing season. She outlines the impact on the school schedule and the disruption to learning. Is it all worth it? Why all this time on test?

Yong Zhao argues that this imposition of high stakes testing is more than a waste of time and a focus on the wrong thing. It is also damaging our global competitiveness.

Tax dollars pour millions into testing companies developing ever more sophisticated instruments and schools devote even more precious learning time to test prep and test taking.

Meanwhile, our global competitors are striving to move away from standardized testing and the assembly line of schooling because they know it strangles creativity and innovation essential for future success. Not to mention killing the joy of learning essential for nurturing the resilient, self-sustaining learners for life we need our children to become.

So as China and other Asian nations strive to move toward more creative and curiosity approaches as a way to ride the wave of innovation and the new culture of learning, the United States is driving in the opposite direction.

Zhao, who is the author of Catching Up or Leading the Way. has a unique perspective on the issues of global competitiveness and the test obsession.

He is currently Presidential Chair and Associate Dean for Global Education, College of Education at the University of Oregon, where he also serves as the director of the Center for Advanced Technology in Education (CATE). He is a fellow of the International Academy for Education.

Until December, 2010,  Zhao was University Distinguished Professor at the College of Education, Michigan State University, where he also served as the founding director of the Center for Teaching and Technology, executive director of the Confucius Institute, as well as the US-China Center for Research on Educational Excellence.

He also grew up in China and came to the US  when he was 27.  His You must be joking Professor Chua was a powerful and personal contribution to the “Tiger Mom” debate.

In this video Zhao  draws on his personal story as he questions the wisdom of current US education policy. He argues that to compete in the world we need  a diversity of talents and to recognize and respect individual passions and creativity.

Watch the video and hear him speak on global competitiveness and why what matters most (our children’s minds,  their resilience and their future) are damaged by the obsession with standardized and high-stakes testing.

No Child Left Behind and Global Competitiveness from New Learning Institute on Vimeo.

What is Education?

What’s your answer?
Take a look at this one delivered by a five year old. Freebrook Academy founded by a PDS alum Monique Scott and open for students in September.

Ask Ken Robinson

Ken Robinson answers questions sent to him via Twitter.

Snow Days and Disruption: An open letter to families

Dear PDS Families:

A few lines (with minor edits)  from division in-boxes and my twitter feed:

Student:

I just wanted to say how I’ve never been so productive or so academically aware on a Snow day. I’ve been working all day today and yesterday making up work for the D day and other classes. I feel home schooled. I miss school. :(

Faculty:

Just finishing up using Edmodo for the first time, I have over three hundred replies in less than an hour in a review session about America in WWI.  Very awesome

I had 100% participation (6th grade) yesterday

I did create a giant loophole when I posted my assignments by calling them homework…due Thursday and Friday. I have only been contacted by 25% of students. I think Edmodo is probably more effective than posting on my PDS site or emailing, but I’ll assess it tomorrow.

Another snow day tomorrow so online class on Edmodo and Google Docs. Keeps us connected and learning. Classrooms have no walls.

Parent:

I just wanted to say that the math homework today was excellent. It was challenging and the electronic format was genius! I hope to see more of them, even on non-snow days.

Thank you for the innovative approach – it is great to see that we are able to use technology in this way

As we make our way through what has already been a most trying winter I want to express my appreciation for the understanding and patience of families and faculty.

One snow day can be a delight but this many become a test and a trial. Above are just a few of the comments coming in about how we are coping with the days of snow and ice. I am sure there will be more and possibly some less positive.

I want to assure families that we are doing, and will do, whatever we can to maintain momentum and ensure continuity in spite of the disruptions.

This is somewhat easier to achieve in the older grades where students have greater independence and they and their teachers can use technology to keep connected and the work flow going. It’s harder with the younger children although their teachers have been talking with them about how to stay engaged and always learning.  I am so appreciative of the faculty willingness to explore new ways to keep in touch with students and their work.

For the older students at PDS these snow days have been disruptive but manageable.

It may not be the same – but students can continue to read and  write essays, responses, poems and  position papers. They can work through mathematical examples, tackle complex problems, listen to French, speak in Spanish and conduct research.

They can create, communicate and contribute  their ideas; collaborate and submit their work; contact each other and their teacher; and receive feedback via Skype, ooVoo, Edmodo, Facebook, Google docs etc. plus wikis, blogs, chats, text, phone and email.

They can learn their lines, practice their music and maintain fitness. They can catch-up,  forge ahead or carve out new directions.

But they can’t rehearse on the stage, perform in the band, sing in the chorus or play on the team.  And – while they can use technology to create a virtual classroom – they can’t sit as a group in the same room, eat lunch together or attend an assembly. It’s not the same.

Activities where it is essential that  students need to be together in real time – play and concert rehearsals, chorus, and basketball for example – have been the hardest hit. And rescheduling is a challenge.

I know that time lost to weather emergencies raises other concerns for families. Sometimes school is closed but work is not. What to do?  We understand the strain and stress on parents who must scramble to find basic child care.

And the academic time lost. Will my child now be at a disadvantage because the class won’t complete the material for that class or complete the course with adequate preparation for the next level? Can the time be made up?

Be assured that we will work to ensure that children are not at any disadvantage because of time lost and that they are indeed moving forward with what they need to do.

In that most annoying but true of axioms – every crisis is an opportunity. And these days of disruption are a chance to discover news ways to get things done and new sources of resilience and support.

I hope all of you are safe, warm, powered and productive. And  I hope to see all of the students very soon!

- Josie

“Knowledge not purchased by the loss of power!”

Children: How will they ever know who they are?

The question is the last line of  “The Things we Steal from Children” by Dr. John Edwards. You can read the whole below. I found it via Leading and Learning - a blog and website from New Zealand that I have long found valuable.

In a different time and context William  Wordsworth asked much the same questions in his remarkable poetic biography The Prelude His plea is for a children who have

“Knowledge not purchased by the loss of power!”

- William Wordsworth The Prelude Book V Line 425

“The Things We Steal From Children”

Dr John Edwards

If I am always the one to think of where to go next.
If where we go is always the decision of the curriculum or my curiosity and not theirs,
If motivation is mine,
If I always decide on the topic to be studied, the title of the story, the problem to be worked on,
If I am always the one who has reviewed their work and decided what they need,
How will they ever know how to begin?

If I am the one who is always monitoring progress.
If I set the pace of all working discussions,
If I always look ahead, foresee problems and endeavour to eliminate them,
If I swoop in and save them from cognitive conflict,
If I never allow them to feel and use the energy from confusion and frustration,
If things are always broken into short working periods,
If myself and others are allowed to break into their concentration,
If bells and I are always in control of the pace and flow of work,
How will they learn to continue their own work?

If all the marking and editing is done by me,
If the selection of which work is to be published or evaluated is made by me,
If what is valued and valuable is always decided by external sources or by me,
If there is no forum to discuss what delights them in their task, what is working,
what is not working, what they plan to do about it,
If they have not learned a language of self-assessment,
If ways of communicating their work are always controlled by me,
If our assessments are mainly summative rather then formative,
If they do not plan their way forward to further action,
How will they find ownership, direction and delight in what they do?

If I speak of individuals but present learning as if they are all the same,
If I am never seen to reflect and reflection time is never provided,
If we never speak together about reflection and thinking and never develop a vocabulary for such discussion,
If we do not take opportunities to think about our thinking,
If I constantly set them exercises that do not intellectually challenge them,
If I set up learning environments that interfere with them learning from their own actions,
If I give them recipes to follow,
If I only expect the one right conclusion,
If I signify that there are always right and wrong answers,
If I never let them persevere with something
really difficult which they cannot master,
If I make all work serious work and discourage playfulness,
If there is no time to explore,
If I lock them into adult time constraints too early,
How will they get to know themselves as a thinker?

If they never get to help anyone else,
If we force them to always work and play with children of the same age,
If I do not teach them the skills of working co-operatively,
If collaboration can be seen as cheating,
If all classroom activities are based on competitiveness,
If everything is seen to be for marks,
How will they learn to work with others?

For if they…
have never experienced being challenged in a safe environment,
have had all of their creative thoughts explained away,
are unaware what catches their interest and how then to have confidence in that interest,
have never followed something they are passionate about to a satisfying conclusion,
have not clarified the way they sabotage their own learning,
are afraid to seek help and do not know who or how to ask,
have not experienced overcoming their own inertia,
are paralysed by the need to know everything before writing or acting,
have never got bogged down,
have never failed,
have always played it safe,
how will they ever know who they are?

There’s something in the air, a revolutions on its way!

The things we steal?  The Edwards  list includes:

Challenge, imagination, magic, serendipity, passion, pursuit, insight, temerity, courage, support, energy, agency, initiative, frustration, failure, independence, self-knowledge.

And from Wordsworth:  All that, and Nature too:

05-08-09-chicks-henIn the extracts below I have bolded what I see as some key elements of Wordsworth’s thinking about childhood, education and his modern age.  It does not take a huge leap of imagination to see the parallels with our time. It’s easy to translate and replace his “evil”  and “pest” (lines 227 and 228) with the education “evil” of our own age.


Is the role of the adult learner-teacher that of Wordsworth’s hen – scratching and ransacking in,  then sharing and making available for discovery, a world of wisdom and knowledge in an atmosphere of tenderness and love?

…. yet I rejoice,
And, by these thoughts admonished, will pour out
Thanks with uplifted heart, that I was reared
Safe from an evil which these days have laid
Upon the children of the land, a pest
That might have dried me up, body and soul.
This verse is dedicate to Nature’s self,                   230
And things that teach as Nature teaches: then,
Oh! where had been the Man, the Poet where,
Where had we been, we two, beloved Friend!
If in the season of unperilous choice,
In lieu of wandering, as we did, through vales
Rich with indigenous produce, open ground
Of Fancy, happy pastures ranged at will,
We had been followed, hourly watched, and noosed,

Each in his several melancholy walk
Stringed like a poor man’s heifer at its feed,             240
Led through the lanes in forlorn servitude;
Or rather like a stalled ox debarred
From touch of growing grass, that may not taste
A flower till it have yielded up its sweets
A prelibation to the mower’s scythe.

Behold the parent hen amid her brood,
Though fledged and feathered, and well pleased to part
And straggle from her presence, still a brood,
And she herself from the maternal bond
Still undischarged; yet doth she little more               250
Than move with them in tenderness and love,
A centre to the circle which they make;
And now and then, alike from need of theirs
And call of her own natural appetites,
She scratches, ransacks up the earth for food,
Which they partake at pleasure.
….

My drift I fear
Is scarcely obvious; but, that common sense
May try this modern system by its fruits,

Leave let me take to place before her sight
A specimen pourtrayed with faithful hand.
Full early trained to worship seemliness,
This model of a child
is never known
To mix in quarrels; that were far beneath                  300
Its dignity; with gifts he bubbles o’er
As generous as a fountain; selfishness
May not come near him, nor the little throng
Of flitting pleasures tempt him from his path;
The wandering beggars propagate his name,
Dumb creatures find him tender as a nun,
And natural or supernatural fear,
Unless it leap upon him in a dream,
Touches him not. To enhance the wonder, see
How arch his notices, how nice his sense                   310
Of the ridiculous; not blind is he
To the broad follies of the licensed world,
Yet innocent himself withal, though shrewd,
And can read lectures upon innocence;
A miracle of scientific lore,
Ships he can guide across the pathless sea,
And tell you all their cunning; he can read
The inside of the earth, and spell the stars;
He knows the policies of foreign lands;
Can string you names of districts, cities, towns,
320
The whole world over, tight as beads of dew
Upon a gossamer thread; he sifts, he weighs;
All things are put to question; he must live
Knowing that he grows wiser every day
Or else not live at all, and seeing too
Each little drop of wisdom as it falls
Into the dimpling cistern of his heart:
For this unnatural growth the trainer blame,
Pity the tree.–Poor human vanity,
Wert thou extinguished, little would be left               330
Which he could truly love; but how escape?

For, ever as a thought of purer birth
Rises to lead him toward a better clime,
Some intermeddler still is on the watch
To drive him back, and pound him, like a stray,

Within the pinfold of his own conceit.
Meanwhile old grandame earth is grieved to find
The playthings, which her love designed for him,
Unthought of: in their woodland beds the flowers
Weep, and the river sides are all forlorn.
340
Oh! give us once again the wishing-cap
Of Fortunatus, and the invisible coat
Of Jack the Giant-killer, Robin Hood,
And Sabra in the forest with St. George!
The child, whose love is here, at least, doth reap
One precious gain, that he forgets himself.

These mighty workmen of our later age,
Who, with a broad highway, have overbridged
The froward chaos of futurity,
Tamed to their bidding; they who have the skill            350
To manage books, and things, and make them act
On infant minds as surely as the sun
Deals with a flower; the keepers of our time,
The guides and wardens of our faculties,
Sages who in their prescience would control
All accidents, and to the very road
Which they have fashioned would confine us down,
Like engines; when will their presumption learn,
That in the unreasoning progress of the world
A wiser spirit is at work for us,                          360
A better eye than theirs, most prodig
al
Of blessings, and most studious of our good,
Even in what seem our most unfruitful hours?

There was a Boy: ye knew him well, ye cliffs
And islands of Winander!–many a time
At evening, when the earliest stars began
To move along the edges of the hills,
Rising or setting, would he stand alone
Beneath the trees or by the glimmering lake,

And there, with fingers interwoven, both hands             370
Pressed closely palm to palm, and to his mouth
Uplifted, he, as through an instrument,
Blew mimic hootings to the silent owls,
That they might answer him; and they would shout
Across the watery vale, and shout again,
Responsive to his call, with quivering peals,
And long halloos and screams, and echoes loud,
Redoubled and redoubled, concourse wild
Of jocund din; and, when a lengthened pause
Of silence came and baffled his best skill,                380
Then sometimes, in that silence while he hung
Listening, a gentle shock of mild surprise
Has carried far into his heart the voice
Of mountain torrents; or the visible scene
Would enter unawares into his mind,
With all its solemn imagery, its rocks,
Its woods, and that uncertain heaven, received
Into the bosom of the steady lake.

This Boy was taken from his mates, and died
In childhood, ere he was full twelve years old.            390
Fair is the spot, most beautiful the vale
Where he was born; the grassy churchyard hangs
Upon a slope above the village school,
And through that churchyard when my way has led
On summer evenings, I believe that there
A long half hour together I have stood
Mute, looking at the grave in which he lies!
Even now appears before the mind’s clear eye
That self-same village church; I see her sit
(The throned Lady whom erewhile we hailed)                 400
On her green hill, forgetful of this Boy
Who slumbers at her feet,–forgetful, too,
Of all her silent neighbourhood of graves,
And listening only to the gladsome sounds
That, from the rural school ascending, play
Beneath her and about her. May she long
Behold a race of young ones like to those
With whom I herded
!–(easily, indeed,
We might have fed upon a fatter soil
Of arts and letters–but be that forgiven)–               410
A race of real children; not too wise,
Too learned, or too good
; but wanton, fresh,
And bandied up and down by love and hate;
Not unresentful where self-justified;
Fierce, moody, patient, venturous, modest, shy;
Mad at their sports like withered leaves in winds;
Though doing wrong and suffering, and full oft
Bending beneath our life’s mysterious weight
Of pain, and doubt, and fear, yet yielding not
In happiness to the happiest upon earth.                   420
Simplicity in habit, truth in speech,
Be these the daily strengtheners of their minds;
May books and Nature be their early joy!
And knowledge, rightly honoured with that name–
Knowledge not purchased by the loss of power!

 

How to Read a Report Card

PDS student reports are not just a list of untethered numbers and letters  but rather in-depth narratives that convey detailed and helpful information about emerging  strengths, accomplishments, challenges, growth and progress.

They are part of the on-going conversation between school and home with the student as  participant, contributor, planner and goal-setter.

Nevertheless – here is some helpful advice for how to react. It’s from Dan Heath – one of the authors of Switch: How to Change when Change is Hard. And it applies to the the business of student learning as well as to business and management: Focus on the strengths and not the problems.

Use the successes in one area – the bright spots – to spread the wealth. Open the conversation about how to explore, clone, replicate and expand what’s working well.