More Failing, Fewer Failures, Greater Success

The November Educational Leadership is devoted to the topic of grading. It includes an article by Alfie Kohn an expanded version of which you can read here: The Case Against Grades.

I’ve given grades. For years I worried about how to get a system right, tried to focus students and their parents on the learning not the grade. I’ve spent countless hours in the foolish pursuit of a better way to grade, the discussion of grade inflation, and what an “A” really means and all the rest of the other distractions from learning.

The more I think about learning, about how children  thrive and about what we – as a society – must ask our schools to do, then the more I know that all the traditional practices of grading and testing -  and all the revamped shiny new versions – are emphatically not what we need

Grades don’t help us learn; they don’t help us try harder; they don’t help us compete; they don’t give us useful information about what to do; and they don’t serve the needs of our learners in school.

We all know learning is about growth. We now all know that knowledge is abundant  to anyone with access to an internet connection. So what we need is what we have always needed: a learning -growth mindset.

And learning  – think about it – is about trial and error. It’s risky. It’s stepping out there. It’s doing something new.  (Think about the child learning to crawl, to walk, to run. It means failing and falling. And along the way the child is cheered, encouraged, supported and successful.)

Learning means failing.

Forty years ago in Wad-ja-get? The grading game in American education  Howard Kirschenbaum, Rodney Napier and Sidney B. Simon  wrote about the corrosive effect of grades on learning. It was true then. It’s true now.

We need kids to grow as learners – doers, thinkers,  makers, creators.  We do not need more test taking successes and failures.

We need real-world problems solved by more people – working together -  whose diverse abilities are called upon to help.

This means more failing and fewer failures. And more success.

Effective Grading Practices? I think that’s an oxymoron.

 

 

Don’t panic: Experience success and failure … as information.

Image from despair.com

Probably the only two responses to constant change are:

A. Ignore it (shrink back, retrench, resist,  go off the grid, become irrelevant, turn inwards, stay put, get run over, and so on) or

B. Keep on keeping on with the learning life.

Clearly Option A can take you only so far.

But what happens if the modern  mantra of: “Keep moving, just try it, have a go, fail-fail-fail and then succeed and fail again”  just results in pushing good people over the edge in a frantic effort to keep up and manage the torrent of the new?

I don’t know the answer to that one. I guess we all have to find our own footing in that take-a-deep-breath, one-step-at-a-time way. It’s all about selectivity, filter finesse and a determination to find balance -  and, when it comes to on-line – what some call the digital diet.

What I find helpful is a problem-solving mental template that I adopted a long time ago. It works something like this:

What’s my way in?

How does this connect with what I already know?

Why does this matter? Does this matter? Is it worthy?

What can it help me do that I have always wanted to do or do better?

Do I actually need or want to learn how to do this?

Or is this something I don’t need to know and  I will leave out there on the edge at least for now?

Basically, it’s first deciding not to panic. Then it’s asking what do I know now, how and where does this connect and what size can I bite off and try and chew.  Is this the creativity zone?

It’s Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development of course. Looking out from the comfort zone of what I already can do, staring into the fearful abyss of what I cannot do and making a move. Go too fast and I’m lost in the panic zone of being overwhelmed.  My filters have failed and I fear drowning.

Is this the creativity zone?

But each step brings failure and success. From there emerges that widening of the comfort zone of the familiar and accomplished (done that, been there got the badges, bruises and benefits to show for it.)

I go back to learning theory – to the incomparable Jerome Bruner and James Britton – both of whom learned from Lev Vygotsky.

Jerome Bruner

If we think of learning as the human capacity to adapt to changes in the environment rather that control them then we’ve on the way to finding a solution.

To live is to learn and to learn is to change, adapt, evolve, transform and be transformed. If as adults we can, in Bruner’s words “experience success and failure not as reward and punishment but as information”* then we are on our way.

And if we help children know that simple truth then we have conferred something of lasting value and significance.

* Jerome Bruner, The Act of Discovery 1961. Harvard Educational Review.

My camera and me

It’s no secret – I like to carry my camera around school and take photographs.

I am endlessly fascinated by kids and what they are up to and how they go about learning and the choices they make. I’ve now got thousands of photographs of life at Poughkeepsie Day School going back five years. And most of them are available on our Flickr site in a somewhat orderly way.

My latest interest is recording the different ways we are all using the Chapman Room. Since the renovation in the summer of 2010 it has become something of a blank slate for community activity.

Sometimes I get some compliments on pics I’ve taken. But truth is, the quality of my photographs is a rather scattershot and random process. I am not a photographer.( I have a nice camera and I try point and shoot in the right direction. And that’s it). But I am heartened by the words of someone who is. On his website Adam DePaz writes:

I always say that it doesn’t matter what camera you have, just keep up the good intentions and you’ll get the results you’re after.

Adam gets great results and I’m encouraged by that emphasis on good intentions. So – if ever I take or publish a picture of you that you truly do not like – just let me know and away it goes into the dustbin of history.

Meanwhile I have been experimenting with the panorama feature on my phone and here are a few examples.

Compasses made at the All-School Activity September 2011

The Dining Room at 4th-8th grade lunch

The Chapman Room ready for lower School Curriculum Evening

Student Self-Portraits

Innisfree Garden in early Fall


Bloxology: The Art and Science of thinking out of, inside, with and beyond the Blox.

Bloxes – they’re everywhere.

All over the Chapman Room and now migrating to the lobby and Kenyon.

What’s a blox? It’s a corrugated cardboard cube. It arrives in six flat pieces. When folded into a grown-up lego-like building block it’s a fascination. It’s a portmanteau word.

Web + Log = Blog

Breakfast + Lunch = Brunch

Box + Block =Blox

And now – thanks to the territorial ambitions of the Fall Festival Reimagined folks (aka everyone) – they are taking over the campus like kudzu.

Sturdy and durable, they lock together to make walls, cubicles,  forts, castles, arches,  towers, hideaways and all kinds of modular furniture. In fact – whatever your mind can make. And then deconstruct and re-make.

They are simple, cunningly imagined and full of infinite possibility. And everyone is drawn to them.

Conceived as an art project by Jef Raskin of Macintosh fame they are now manufactured by his son Aza (“To the user the interface is the product”) Raskin. He describes bloxes as:

…essentially 3D cardboard legos that ship flat, and fold up in modular building blocks that are strong enough to stand on. While they aren’t tech per se, we use them for building tables, walls, cubicles, and desks. Both Google and Mozilla have expressed interest in using them in their offices. So, this may well be the new thing in terms of agile office-space deployment. Don’t like where a wall is? Just move it! Don’t like the way it looks? Just rebuild it! They are cheaper than cubicles, and much more fun.

Bloxes – they’re too good to be left to the kids.  So – drop by and make one for yourself. And join right in.  Many minds, many hands, one bloxbuster. And don’t worry about taking something down. It may happen to yours too when it’s time for something new.

"Now I get it! So that's how they fit together!"

Blox builders trying to hide how much fun they had

The bloxes migrate to Kenyon

Wnen you're building a castle there's a job for everyone

 

Great place to close the door and get some late day homework done

Call it what you want - it's a great hideout

These rock monsters found a good place to hide

And bloxes provide protection for Butterscotch Pony

Progress has to be celebrated

"I'm baaack!"

Can anything stop the territorial ambitions of Bloxes Gone Wild?

For lots more community building blox photos go the Bloxed Set on  PDS Flickr.

Occupy Education: The Revolution Starts Now

As always, lots of good stuff in the latest edition of Independent School, the quarterly magazine from NAIS.

And those who hold rather outdated notions of independent schools as universal staunch defenders of tradition and the home of the status quo might be surprised by the theme:  Evolution or Revolution: the Pace of Change in Schools.

Evolution or revolution? – both suggest that things are on the move, change is afoot and the status quo is to be questioned, challenged or perhaps  overturned.

In the end, it seems,  education and schools are not immune from the whirlwind – fueled by technology -  that has upended virtually every other industry. (Think music, medicine, publishing, news media, communications, manufacturing and etc.) That glacial pace is picking up.

The magazine includes this call to arms by  Elizabeth Coleman, the president of Bennington College and  an NAIS trustee: The Revolution Starts Now.

Coleman wrote this before the #OccupyWallStreet movement took root in downtown Manhattan – indeed she delivered a version of this at the NAIS annual conference last spring -  but  it resonates with the sources of that discontent and remains important and timely.

Elizabeth Coleman is not one to mince words. She begins with  inescapable brutal facts that:

During the past decade, we have witnessed escalating crises in the most vital areas of our public life, including: a relentless acceleration in our awesome failure to effectively educate vast numbers of our young; a no-less-relentless increase in the spectacular inequities in the distribution of wealth; an extraordinary timidity, to put it politely, in our approach to providing health care; a growing incapacity to discuss, much less confront, the potential of global warming to upend human civilization itself; an assault on the principles that define us as a people (the rule of law, the separation of powers, the relationship between church and state); a disconcerting predilection for the uses of force despite overwhelming evidence of its limitations; and a squandering of our material and ethical resources in less than a decade that defies credulity.

And at a time when clarity of thought, respect for evidence, and appreciation for complexity is especially critical, the sensationalism of the media — the other major educational institution in our society — continues undiminished. The distance we have traveled is best measured by reminding ourselves that the Federalist Papers were published in three New York newspapers and then, in response to popular demand, published in newspapers throughout the colonies. There is no more damning evidence of the failure of education in this country than the quality of what the public craves or tolerates in its media.

While Coleman sees a crisis,  the academic establishment, she says,  moves on as if oblivious to the tumult and chaos; education is increasingly defined in economic and vocational terms while the health of the democracy is left to languish. Education, she laments is seen not as an intrinsic value but as a handmaiden to political, economic and religious interests and remains “… a blank slate on which virtually anything can be written.”

Coleman sees the purpose of education as being not to perpetuate the status quo but to challenge and change it for the better.

Our neglect of the distinctive power and responsibility of education is especially perilous in a democracy.

She connects this thinking with the nation’s founding philosophers:

From the beginning of this great American experiment in self-governance, education was universally understood to be critical in determining its fate. Thomas Jefferson put it most succinctly: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be….

Questions such as “What kind of a world are we making? What kind of a world should we be making? What kind of a world can we be making?” move off the table as beyond our ken. Incredibly, neutrality about such concerns is seen as a condition of academic integrity.

Coleman’s argument proceeds from there and includes the necessity – as she sees it – to take a stand on the vital issue on which democracy is founded.

Education, she says, is more than crudely vocational however lofty or urgent it is made to sound. She quotes President Bill Clinton’s State of the Union message of 1994 “We measure every school by one high standard: Are children learning what they need to know to compete and win in the global economy.”

And she asks:

That’s it? That’s the whole story?

One might reasonably consider economic well-being to be one of the desirable outcomes of a successful education, but that is a very different matter from its becoming the sole objective of such an education — the standard by which everything is to be measured.

She has much more to say on the subject and offers some ways forward and out of our current dilemma with an education focus on the compelling needs, human purpose and what it takes to educate for sustained  democracy and democratic values.

And her conclusion presents the  stark alternative: the status quo or revolution:

Finally, the world is right in its ongoing passionate commitment to the power of education, despite everything. Imagine what could happen if we do it right. Imagine what will happen if we do not. The stakes could not be higher. We are unlikely to have a viable democracy made up of experts, politicians, zealots, and spectators.

For Elizabeth Coleman  education -  aka the liberal arts and sciences -  should focus on broad subjects relevant to our immediate problems. And they are: Equity, the environment, health care, education, governance, and the uses of force. She believes that the task of  education – specifically colleges -  should be to re-engage communities around these pivotal issues and that our survival depends upon that refocus.

For some of the specifics of what she has in mind read the full essay: The Revolution Starts Now.

Save Butterscotch Pony


The Race to the Bottom: What can schools do now?

The future is based on impromptu innovation, inspiration and connections – that’s a paraphrase from Seth Godin’s blog today and I urge you to read it: The forever recession (and the coming revolution).

And when you have ask this question: If Seth Godin is even close to right: What kind of schools, classrooms, programs – what kind of education-  do we need now?

And then switch out the workers, factories and the  economy and replace with children, schools and education. Any alarming parallels?

Godin argues that the industrial age, factory era of good jobs anchored to specific geography and replaceable work is gone forever and on a global scale this is what we have instead:

There’s a race to the bottom, one where communities fight to suspend labor and environmental rules in order to become the world’s cheapest supplier. The problem with the race to the bottom is that you might win…

Recognizing that this is a life-changing discontinuity, a disappointment and hardship for many hardworking people he also sees opportunity for those who can grasp it

When everyone has a laptop and connection to the world, then everyone owns a factory. Instead of coming together physically, we have the ability to come together virtually, to earn attention, to connect labor and resources, to deliver value.

 No one is trained in how to do this, in how to initiate, to visualize, to solve interesting problems and then deliver.

Why not? And shouldn’t schools be centered on just that?

Some see the new work as a hodgepodge of little projects, a pale imitation of a ‘real’ job. Others realize that this is a platform for a kind of art, a far more level playing field in which owning a factory isn’t a birthright for a tiny minority but something that hundreds of millions of people have the chance to do.

For some this will mean a life of lowered expectations and service. But for Godin the bright flipside is a kind of freewheeling freedom and opportunity available to those who can grasp it and make it work.

 In one direction is lowered expectations and plenty of burger flipping. In the other is a race to the top, in which individuals who are awaiting instructions begin to give them instead.

So which direction does standardized schooling and standardized testing and all the other deadening routines lead? The future, Godin says:

… feels a lot more like marketing–it’s impromptu, it’s based on innovation and inspiration, and it involves connections between and among people–and a lot less like factory work, in which you do what you did yesterday, but faster and cheaper.

And then Godin goes right to heart of the secondary problem: With these changed expectations we also need to change our training and approaches to what works. If what we imagine to be the  status quo is actually gone forever then we have to stop fighting for the past and engage with the future.

Job creation is a false idol. The future is about gigs and assets and art and an ever-shifting series of partnerships and projects.

Ok – so – back to that opening question. If you think anything of what Godin has to say (and please read the whole thing) what are the implication for schools -  the curriculum, the approaches to learning – and the work of the children and adults inside them?

Education is not about preparing children to enter a workforce. But take a good look at schools and classrooms and programs and ask – what is this designed to do? What is the thinking here? Does what is happening in any way connect with a sense of how the world is in shift and what children need to thrive in the here-and-now.

And to help us with direction here is a collage of the compasses created in yesterday’s all-school activity. There’s one missing and I have to track it down. For more pictures of groups at work click here.

Compasses from the all-school activity September 28th 2011

“Parents needed as Play Agents?… Surely You’re Joking PDS!”

If you’ve been to the webpage, read your email,  looked at Facebook or been on campus you will know that the  FFR (Fall Festival Reimagined) wing of the PA is actively recruiting older students and parents to be Play Agents for the big event on Saturday, November 19th.

Readers of this blog will know that I’m a card-carrying believer in the power of play as key intellectual activity.

Sometimes it has another name – tinkering, making, doing, thinking, creating, engaging etc. But at heart it’s all a kind of play.And play matters.

It’s play that allows us the grit to keep us sticking with whatever it is we need to do.  It’s play that puts us into direct connection with what we already know and what we need to learn next. It’s play that keeps us on the edge of what we don’t know and it’s play that puts us into relationship with others.

It’s what we mean when we say: “Connect joy to learning.”

And it’s deadly serious intellectual stuff.

Play is where imagination,  invention, innovation, connection and discovery  collide. Play is at the very core of learning.

Play is when we are in that state that psychologist Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi calls Flow and it’s what makes us happy.

For a little confirmation read this extract from Richard Feynman – Nobel Prize winner for Physics:

Uncorking the bottle: Piddling around with the wobbling plate

But when it came time to do some research. I couldn’t get to work. I was a little tired; I was not interested; I couldn’t do research! …
And then I thought to myself, “You know, what they think of you is so fantastic, it’s impossible to live up to it. You have no responsibility to live up to it!”…
Then I had another thought; Physics disgusts me a little bit now, but I used to enjoy doing physics. Why did I enjoy it? I used to play with it. I used to do whatever I felt like doing – it didn’t have to do with whether it was important for the development of nuclear physics…
So I get this new attitude … I’m going to play with physics, whenever I want to, without worrying about any importance whatsoever.
Within a week I was in the cafeteria and some guy, fooling around, throws a plate in the air. …
I had nothing to do, so I start to figure out the motion of the rotating plate…
And before I knew it (it was a very short time) I was “playing” – working, really – with the same old problem that I loved so much, that I had stopped working on when I went to Los Alamos; my thesis-type problems; all those old-fashioned wonderful things.
It was effortless. It was easy to play with these things. It was like uncorking a bottle: Everything flowed out effortlessly. …
There was no importance to what I was doing, but ultimately there was. The diagrams and the whole business that I got the Nobel Prize for came from that piddling around with the wobbling plate.

So being a Play Agent is serious stuff.TMF = Too Much Fun

The creator of kindergarten – Friedrich Froebel – said that play was the work of the child.

The moment we are off the mechanical treadmill it is also the work of all of us. If he were around now he might say something like: ” Play is not just for five year-olds anymore. In the innovation age that replaced the era of information, play is the work of us all.”

But he would say it better and he would be founding a movement as powerful, creative and life changing as a play-fueled, learning-filled  kindergarten.

Middle School Play Agents VideoSo come be a Play Agent.

I think the truth is -  these PA FFR organizers are on to something. This play stuff is not just for kids any more. And anyway, they seem to be having way too much fun. Come join in. Find your way to play.

There’s video proof of the fun right here.

All this change ….

How many blocks tall are you now?

For adults like me who work in schools September means being confronted with a world of change.  There are new faces of course, and names to learn. There are new courses, fresh paint on the walls and sometimes new structures and renovations to get used to.

And the familiar is unfamiliar too. Children have grown taller, and they return to school full of stories of summer adventures and new experiences. They are changed by the time spent playing in the yard, their new friends, their summer jobs and community service. They return with new interests and passions, revised dreams and aspirations.  Now they can swim, have a passion for photography or physics, improv theater or mountain trekking, found new depths of empathy, tested themselves, joined a life-changing cause, know what they want to study in college.

And, disconcertingly, we realize that we are back at the beginning. Here are small children just beginning their adventures in school, learning new routines for the first time. And teachers start at the beginning the all important work of building community norms and routines they took for granted in June. And gosh! Yes – we did teach beginning algebra last year and here we are again doing the same thing.

And most of these changes we welcome.

This is the circle of life in school. It has its seasons and its ever-evolving inevitability of change that we adjust to, welcome and celebrate.

Like the coming of autumn – we miss the days of summer but look forward to crisp mornings, the fall foliage, the first fire and wearing that favorite sweater again.

I read recently that 92% of two year olds have an online presence. (All those sonogram pics and baby photos posted on line and sent to the grandparents.) And that by the time many children are in elementary school they are googlable and already have a digital footprint. This is a new kind of change for most of us. And it has significance for us and the children we teach.

This is the other world of change that comes at us with a relentless and accelerating pace.  And it has implications for how we conduct ourselves in school.

If we are serious as educators then it means we have to be serious about our proficiency with digital tools.  If we want to protect our students and if we want to equip them for their futures then we have to be talking about it in school as well as modeling and building and sharing our own digital impact.

Some things are no longer acceptable in schools. Just as we no longer seek to tether children to their desks for hours on end (some schools like PDS never did) we also have to accept the hands-on responsibility for learning in the digital era. No more indulgent chuckles about those darn digital kids.

But it’s not about keeping up with the bewildering array of new tools that come at us wave after wave

It is rather a focus on how we teach – on pedagogy – and on the purpose of it all. And when we do that we open up the possibility for embracing change. This is a truly exciting time to be in education.  We now have the tools and resources for learning and collaboration that earlier educators could only dream about.

When we replace the fear of the unknown with the awareness of possibility – when we are driven by curiosity – then the new world of learning is an adventure.

This is the world our students inhabit. And so do we.

4th and 5th grade Reading CircleAnd here is just one example from 4th and 5th grade of how change can work.

Children  have been reading and writing about Natalie Babbitt’s fantasy novel Tuck Everlasting since it was first published in 1975.

But now – they can connect with readers within and beyond the confines of the classroom walls. In this Global Read-Aloud blog children join the community of readers who reflect, speculate, anticipate and comment on their reading.

This is a whole new and powerful way  for children to join what psycho-linguist Frank Smith once called “The Literacy Club”.

In another example from the summer, four girls used the publishing and collaborating tools available on line to create Have you Heard? – a magazine centered Have You Heard? A Magazine for the PDS Communityon change and school.

Some children are notoriously averse to change. They are nostalgic for the way things were notwithstanding they complained bitterly about them at the time.  Emotional connections endure. And learning about the past and knowing what once was is more important than ever. In times of change we need even more ties to history to serve as anchors, platforms and stabilizers.

And so – to accommodate these change-resistant children I say we should insist that these kids stop changing too.

All that growing and learning that they do….Stop it! We liked you the way you were.  It’s too stressful for us poor adults to deal with.  Not to mention the expense of all those new shoes

The Happy Factor and the Dismal World of Work

Do Happier Students Work Harder?

When PDS high school students took the HSSSE (High School Survey of Student engagement) the results were astonishing. They outperformed their peers in other schools across the spectrum.

Our students reported high levels of involvement, feeling safe and supported, deep engagement in their work and feeling  positive about their school and classroom environment. And the margin of difference was significant especially in the areas of social and emotional connection – that sense of belonging and purpose.

This was a source of satisfaction – not complacency – because we know that happier children do better work, are more creative, have more positive energy and make better progress.

For some time we have used the tag: connect joy with learning because we intuitively know what neuroscience and psychology tell us: Feelings matter and at work and school they are deeply connected with mission, purpose, progress, ownership and engagement.

Can schools make people happy yes, no, sometimes, perhaps. But too many of us know from personal experience that they can sure make you miserable.

Pat Bassett- President of  NAIS – often counsels school leaders to hire happy people and take it from there.


There’s an interesting article in today’s NYTimes  about employees in the workplace and it paints a dismal picture.

The title is:

Do Happier People Work Harder?

And it’s by

By TERESA AMABILE and STEVEN KRAMER

Who are

Teresa Amabile, a professor at Harvard Business School, and Steven Kramer, an independent researcher, are the authors of “The Progress Principle.”

Read it for  its insights about the dismal world of work, why it matters and what can be done to change it.

It refers to:

The Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, which has been polling over 1,000 adults every day since January 2008, shows that Americans now feel worse about their jobs — and work environments — than ever before. People of all ages, and across income levels, are unhappy with their supervisors, apathetic about their organizations and detached from what they do. And there’s no reason to think things will soon improve.

(Are classrooms and the lives of many children in them any different? The one difference I see is that small children are invariably bubbling over with eagerness to learn. For better or worse – and for whatever reasons – things do calm down on the excitement front as children get older. And sometimes of course it goes away altogether and there you have your unhappy person.)

I picked out a few of the key points and applied them polemically to school and to students.

I switched out workers and employees for children and students. replaced bonuses and incentives with grades, gold stars and test scores. And so on.

Doing that made the parallel case for meaningful work in schools where children connect what they do with what they want to learn. And where their progress in solving meaningful problems -  not bubble sheets – is celebrated not tested. And where satisfaction, productivity, engagement and creativity matter

So here’s my rewrite. I hope they don’t mind.

Do Happier Students Work Harder?

When children don’t care about their learning or their schools and teachers, they don’t show up consistently, they produce less, or their quality suffers.

Student  engagement is a key difference maker in productivity, creativity, and quality of work. Feeling bad at school leads to lower performance and poor results.

Research shows that inner work life has a profound impact on children’s creativity, productivity, commitment and collegiality. Students are far more likely to have new ideas on days when they feel happier. Conventional wisdom suggests that pressure and testing enhances performance; our real-time data, however, shows that students perform better when they are happily engaged in what they do.

Of all the events that engage students at school,  the single most important — by far — is simply making progress in meaningful work.

As long as students experience their efforts as meaningful, progress is often followed by joy and excitement about the work. This kind of rich inner work life improves performance, which further supports inner work life and learning — a positive spiral.

Progress in meaningful work is the primary motivator, well ahead of traditional incentives like grades, gold stars and test scores.

The catalysts for improved learning, progress and engagement are student autonomy, sufficient resources and learning from problems.

School-age children spend more of their waking hours at school than anywhere else. School work should ennoble, not kill, the human spirit. Promoting children’s well-being isn’t just ethical; it makes educational sense. Fostering positive inner lives sometimes requires schools and teachers to better articulate meaning in the work.  If those who lead and work in schools believe their mission is, in part, to support students’ everyday progress, we could end the disengagement crisis and, in the process, lift our students’ well-being and our education performance levels.

Transformation

We have a new lobby in one of our buildings – the Elizabeth C. Gilkeson Center – and  as you can see from these two pictures it’s quite stunning.

This is the first place most visitors see and it’s where almost everyone passes through at least once a day and usually more often. It’s where visitors are received, students wait for buses and where their  drivers come in from the cold and and can turn off their idling engines.

It’s a place to read a book, have a conversation and watch the PDS world whirl by. In other words it’s an important place for the school community – reception area, theater foyer, display space, waiting room and  agora.

It’s a place for ideas, inspiration, imagination and invention and a place to find the company to do it all with.

It’s colorful, comfortable, appealing and attractive.  It includes the living green wall of plants and a LED monitor to help us keep track of events and stay informed. It has cabinets and wall space for display. It has room to move and  places to sit.

And – it also has an elephant. (You will have to look for that.)

This is a place of beauty where form serves function. I hope you come and see it soon. And when you see Board president Stan Lichens thank him for this transformation and let him know what you think.

Blotting your copybook

That tweet from Gary Stager reminded me of this scene:

Blotting your copybook used to be more than a figure of speech. It was, for some, a frightening everyday reality of life in school. This scene resonates with me. Taking dictation, keeping up, making mistakes, trying to cover up, failing behind. And using that dip-in pen with ink from the inkwell embedded in the desk. Childhood nightmare in the making.

There are many terrific school scenes in The 400 Blows ( Les Quatre Cents Coups directed by François Truffaut 1959.) The recipient of the “blows”, Antoine Doinel, suffers mightily from the injustice meted out by Sourpuss. The film portrays so many poignant disconnects and misunderstandings between adults and the reality of children’s perceptions, lives and experience.

This post led to some interesting commentary on the subject of the move away from teaching cursive and why it’s not going to go  away quietly just yet at least.  I won’t mourn that passing either but there is something very personal about the handwritten. Looking back at old  notes taken in class, at diary entries and essays I know immediately that I wrote them. All that emphasis on neatness over content and time spent on practice created a very indifferent style*.  But one that is distinctly mine.

* (One teacher who lamented that he could not read my work said it was the work of a mad spider.)